Ha ha, I keep coming back to this thread
.
Bue, the details of the book are starting to fade a bit for me now, but I think some of the flatness is the futility of the always-replayed lives, even when Ursula gets it mostly right. (Ie the last life, Teddy survives, Nancy survives, and yet, it still goes back to the beginning. ) I think it's supposed to feel a bit bleak and futile, maybe? I felt it was anyway.
alpinemeadow I didn't really pick up on the headaches carrying through her lives. Could it be just all the noise in her head from experiences carried over from different lives?
(Incidentally, one of my favourite lines is when she stops them all getting Spanish flu by inventing the maid's sweetheart being unfaithful, then says something like 'well at least no-one got pushed down the stairs' and then they all look at her like
.
I agree with you about seemingly significant events that then don't crop again. In one life she meets a woman by a water pump in London during the war, and it feels like a connection, and that this woman will play a bigger part in another life. But no, we don't hear of her again. Do you think it, again, is just noise? ie Ursula has mixed-up half experiences from many lives going round in her head, and sometimes they get a bit confused. Don't really know tbh.
I loved this book Bue (can you tell
?) but I also loved When Will There be Good News, despite the fairly dark subject matter. I loved the self-possession and competence of Joanna Hunter and the cinematic ending (don't want to spoil) of her exit at the derelict house with her baby. I loved Reggie's innate intelligence. And Louise's messed-up attitude to love. Could go on and on . . . !