And women should not have to protect themselves from violent men.
Maybe not, but they do have a responsibility to protect their children from them, if they know the man to be violent. Repeatedly returning to, or spending time with a man who hurts you is one thing, but when you know they have seriously hurt your child and you still won't remove yourself from them completely, that's on a whole other level.
I am wondering why this particular man is still at liberty to come banging on her door though - I would have thought at the very least he should have an injunction against him to prevent him going near his child. I suppose it depends on the severity of the injury and I don't know much about the procedures or the likelihood of criminal charges being pressed with this sort of thing.
However I am bewildered that the OP is so reluctant to call the police to have him removed from outside her home and yet she's apparently happy to leave the house with the child to go to hotel while he is supposedly outside and being abusive and threatening to kill her. Either that or she's letting him in and then saying that she removes herself and the child instead.
It's not stacking up for me and I think she's scrabbling to find a story that might sound plausible to SS when basically, whichever way you turn it, she has failed to do what she was told she must do in order to keep her DD.
Also, correct me if I am wrong, but where has the OP actually said this man has been violent or abusive towards her, other than threatening to smash the windows and kill her since he was made to move out at the insistence of SS?
There are lots of posters making assumptions and actually stating here that she has been suffering DV for years at the hands of this man, but we know no such thing. We only know he hurt the child and as a result of that has been made to leave the family home, which he then returns to and gets verbally abusive and makes threats because he wants to be let back in.
Of course it would be no great surprise to find out he has been violent to the OP during their relationship, but we shouldn't just assume it.