My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Join our Primary Education forum to discuss starting school and helping your child get the most out of it.

Primary education

Bit disappointed about the phonics test

108 replies

Campaspe · 17/06/2013 19:19

Have read with DD religiously just about every day, and we've spent plenty of time at home going over phonics. She came home today and told me she struggled with a lot of the words, and the teacher had a list of the ones she got wrong. So, it sounds as if in spite of her best efforts, DD didn't pass the check.

We read every night. We sound out words. She likes books and stories. She knows her sounds really well, but gets muddled when putting them back into words. We've worked together on this, but it just hasn't clicked yet. In class, she reads purple books and her teacher hasn't mentioned any concerns.

I feel disappointed that after all DD's (and mine!) work, it just hasn't clicked yet. What more can I do? Will it just sort itself out? Does it really matter?

OP posts:
Report
Elibean · 21/06/2013 21:19

I am very happy to say that dd2 didn't even know she'd taken the test. They certainly didn't use the word 'test', they just "went into Mrs X's little room and read some silly made up words" and dd really enjoyed herself.

If it had been remotely like Fairy's dd's experience, I would be furious too. As it is, I'm relieved and pleased that the school kept it as it should be - utterly low-key.

Oh - and the parents weren't aware it was happening either. It was just part of their day.

Report
mrz · 21/06/2013 19:08

FairyJen you can't blame the screening check for the stupidity of your child's teacher/school.

Report
mrz · 21/06/2013 19:06

and of course all those words are 2 syllable words learnandsay so too dificult for the check apparently.

Report
AlienAttack · 21/06/2013 17:51

fairyjen that sounds awful. But surely it isn't the test which is at fault, it is the teacher who chose to describe it in these ridiculous and stressful terms to your DD? I think we have to separate concerns about the test itself from how it was delivered by certain schools.

Report
maizieD · 21/06/2013 17:48

She was very stressed leading up to it as they were told you need to pass it to get into year 2.

Unbelievable....Shock

Report
HarumScarum · 21/06/2013 14:40

I think it's awful that they described it as a test. As far as DD and her friends were concerned, they were just doing some 1 to 1 work with a teacher which happens often anyway. And then they got a jelly bean. Some of these children are not yet 6 - they don't need to know they are being tested.

Report
RikeBider · 21/06/2013 13:41

Wow, I would complain about that teacher! What is she playing at?

Report
FairyJen · 21/06/2013 13:31
  • tears not terms
Report
FairyJen · 21/06/2013 13:30

I really disagree with this test. I call it a test as that is how it was described to dd and her class. She was very stressed leading up to it as they were told you need to pass it to get into year 2. She was off ill a couple of days and was in a flap that she had missed it. When she did the test she was told she scored 39. She came out of school in terms that day thinking that because she had missed one poxy mark that she would not be going up with her friends.

I had to get the teacher to explain that she had passed. Personally I think this is too much too young!

< gets off soapbox >

Report
plusonemore · 21/06/2013 13:26

really should have read whole thread! Glad she did well

Report
plusonemore · 21/06/2013 13:23

OP she might have done well- the way its recorded is a tick for every word but there is a correct column and a not correct column! Perhaps she just thought every time the teacher made a mark it was wrong? Teachers shouldn't be commenting on how many they got right or otherwise. Please don't stressSmile Smile

Report
RikeBider · 21/06/2013 13:21

Alien names seems much more meaningful and relevant to a young child than incredibly obscure "real" words - they are much more likely to come across alien names/words in books.

Report
RikeBider · 21/06/2013 13:19

OK, but if you need to find such obscure words that there is no chance a 6 year old will have come across it, so a word that doesn't appear in children's fiction or non-fiction books, a word that isn't on any signs, isn't used in conversation, doesn't appear in magazines or newspapers - then what is the point?

Report
learnandsay · 21/06/2013 13:16

They're just (more or less) in the order I came across them in the dictionary.

Report
RikeBider · 21/06/2013 13:14

Abib might as well be Obib though. Not sure why abib is better?

Report
scaevola · 21/06/2013 13:12

It would indeed be a strange child. But generally it's better to run screenings to the highest standards, and that includes removing potential confounders wherever possible.

Report
learnandsay · 21/06/2013 13:06

It would be a strange child who was familiar with all of them!

Report
learnandsay · 21/06/2013 13:04

My dictionary is 1200 pages long and I don't see any shortage of short and obscure words in it. But of course the argument could centre around how obscure is obscure.
abaft
abib
ablet
ablush
aberr
ablaut

and that's just the top of page 3

Report
scaevola · 21/06/2013 12:56

Not for a screening test. For no matter how obscure the word, you may find pupils who have encountered it before.

But obscure words are likely to be novel for most, so there is a virtuous circle of introducing lots of them to practice novel decoding and to enrich vocabulary. And given that this is for 5/6 year olds, the words needn't be that obscure to widen vocabulary and reinforce skills.

Report
RikeBider · 21/06/2013 12:53

You'd have to use very obscure but short and fairly easily decodable words though - quite difficult to come up with 20 different appropriate ones every year I'd have though?

Report
learnandsay · 21/06/2013 12:49

Nonsense words are required to ensure that it is decoding that is being used.

That's not strictly true, obscure real words could be used instead.

Report
learnandsay · 21/06/2013 12:46

My children don't have a white British background and it doesn't seem to be a problem as far as reading is concerned, nor does speaking another language. But, if it is a problem I suppose the screening check has just pointed it out, which is what supporters would say it's supposed to do. I'd be inclined to wonder if it suggested more about the children's parents than the children themselves.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

RikeBider · 21/06/2013 12:42

tiggytape, surely all schools are prepping their children for it? What are the ones that don't teach decoding doing?

Report
postmanpatscat · 21/06/2013 12:20

Nope, not a whole class of SEN - I have 30 children, one of whom has a statement and she scored above the threshold. However, 29 of my 30 have a background other than White British and of those 25 speak at least one other language. Some joined Reception with no English at all.

Report
Greythorne · 21/06/2013 11:50

masha
Moderate as ever!

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.