My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Join our Primary Education forum to discuss starting school and helping your child get the most out of it.

Primary education

4As in Yr4 - how unusual?

241 replies

SilverBellsandCockleShells · 15/03/2013 07:15

I went to parents' evening yesterday. We've recently moved our 8yo son because we knew he was bright and felt he was underperforming and our decision appears to have been vindicated! After predicting a 3a for him by the end of the year after their initial assessments, they have now assessed him as 4a for maths, and 4b for English, and reckon he will improve to 4a by the end of the year if he continues to focus and improve as he is doing.

Obviously this is good! Grin I was just wondering how good. Are they the kind of levels you would expect the top children in a yr4 class to be achieving? Or is it more exceptional than that. I'm vaguely considering scholarships but don't want to push him if he is just averagely outstanding, if such a thing exists!

OP posts:
Report
rabbitstew · 16/03/2013 12:11

And what have special schools got to do with expected levels, given that expected levels are nothing to do with ability or, apparently, averages?

Report
Itchyandscratchy · 16/03/2013 12:22

Forget about the levels and get used to focusing on what children achieve at each key stage. The NC levels are being scrapped.

New programmes of study for 2014 here. No mention of levels whatsoever and we all need to start getting our heads round this.

Report
Feenie · 16/03/2013 12:26

Good.

Report
Feenie · 16/03/2013 12:32

From the new English curriculum:

All the skills of language are essential to participating fully as a member of society; pupils, therefore, who do not learn to read and write fluently and confidently, are, in every sense, disenfranchised.

It's punctuated correctly, of course, but what kind of clumsy sentence construction is that? Hmm

Report
mrz · 16/03/2013 12:32

no but it has to do with the percentage of pupils achieving a level 4 or above ... the percentage achieving this is much higher than you suggested.

Report
swallowedAfly · 16/03/2013 13:09

the odd really rude poster on this thread.

mrz - exactly ALL means ALL.

Report
swallowedAfly · 16/03/2013 13:12

if average IQ = 100 and that is the average of everyone including those born with brain damage, severe learning disabilities etc then yes i would see having an IQ of 90 as being a disadvantage and a barrier to learning.

Report
rabbitstew · 16/03/2013 13:12

But mrz, it is not much higher than I suggested - only 79% of children achieve a level 4 or above in English and Maths. I suggested it was 75%.

Report
rabbitstew · 16/03/2013 13:14

swallowedAfly - that is not what average IQ means and educational psychologists would not view an IQ of 90 as being a barrier to learning. They would view it as having an average IQ.

Report
rabbitstew · 16/03/2013 13:16

swallowedAfly - do you remember studying the mean, median and mode when learning about averages????....

Report
mrz · 16/03/2013 13:20

and it doesn't alter the fact that nationally approx a third of all children are working at a similar level to the OPs child

Report
Taffeta · 16/03/2013 13:22

I don't know. I really don't know. How do people know what other children in the year are achieving unless they are teachers?

DS is Y4, he was at 4a for Maths at parents evening in Nov, and got a 4 for reading in a recent assessment, but otherwise I've no idea.

He is very sporty. Is exceptional at football, cricket and tennis. Scholarships had never entered my head as I assume they are for the tremendously gifted?

Report
swallowedAfly · 16/03/2013 13:37

i don't give a toss about how an educational psychologist would see it - this is a thread on mn where opinions are being exchanged. imo an IQ of 90 is a barrier to educational success - of course it is!

Report
swallowedAfly · 16/03/2013 13:38

yep mrz - likely the third who have no SEN, no disablities, health issues etc and have had some degree of support and encouragement from home.

Report
swallowedAfly · 16/03/2013 13:42

taffeta i think they're for the tremondously driven to be honest. two children with good ability and a bit of natural talent will end up with differing levels of 'excellence' depending on personality, interest etc and whether their parents push and pay for the lessons etc. different with the very rare mozart level genius but that is exceedingly rare.

Report
Taffeta · 16/03/2013 13:46

Yes I can imagine that swallowed. Not for DS methinks. Smile

Report
rabbitstew · 16/03/2013 13:48

I've never viewed scholarships as being for the tremendously gifted, because I was offered one, my dh went through private schools on full scholarships and it has been suggested to us that we ought to be approaching schools seeking scholarships for our ds1. I don't think his SATs levels at school are sky high for his age, although they are obviously considerably higher than the "expected" level.

Report
Farewelltoarms · 16/03/2013 14:00

Really mrz - a third of all children are working at a 4a midway through y4? That would suggest huge amounts getting sixes by end.
That sounds v high. My kids' school gets pretty good results at ks2 and I was told my son was pretty much at top with a couple of others and was only 4c at Xmas.
Are they falling short? Are they a particularly low achieving cohort (v mixed inner city school but disproportionate no of Oxbridge etc parents)? Or does the school measure in stricter way?

Report
lljkk · 16/03/2013 14:03

I can't understand why MRZ said that, either.

Report
mrz · 16/03/2013 14:04

Yes really Farewelltoarms as that would equate to the 30-35% achieving level 5 or above in Y6 which are the official DfE figures

Report
mrz · 16/03/2013 14:05

A level 4A in Y4 does not equate to level 6 in Y6 Farewelltoarms ... good progress would be a full level over TWO years ie Y4-Y6.

Report
mrz · 16/03/2013 14:06

"The percentages of pupils achieving above the expected level, Level 5 or above, in the 2011 Key Stage 2 tests by subject are as follows:

English 29 per cent (down 3 percentage points from 33 per cent in 2010)
Reading 43 per cent (down 8 percentage points from 50 per cent in 2010)
Writing 20 per cent (down 1 percentage point from 21 per cent in 2010)
Mathematics 35 per cent (up 1 percentage point from 34 per cent in 2010)

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

rabbitstew · 16/03/2013 14:09

mrz - a level 4A in year 4 may not equate to level 6 in year 6 in your school, but it does in my dss' school. Possibly because children do not progress through all schools in a linear way, unless they are rigorously taught to the test all the way through, of course. Since you don't have statistics for children's levels in year 4, I think you are attempting to sound far more confident than you actually are about reality.

Report
Coconutty · 16/03/2013 14:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

rabbitstew · 16/03/2013 14:13

We are only halfway through the school year, so a 4A now should/could be a level 5 by the end of the year.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.