When I can I take my daughter to historical re-enactments. We haven't been to many yet and those that we have been to she hasn't liked much, except parts of Norwich castle.) The Viking one that we went to recently had open fires and the smoke got in her eyes. Then men with chain-mail and heavy shields fought and she asked if we could go home! But she did seem to absorb lots of details about their clothes, their food, their cooking methods and so on. So, even though she claimed not to have liked it I think that trip was worth it. Thinking about King Alfred makes me think of Saxon food. But in practice it seems so similar to Viking food that it doesn't seem worth making a special effort to visit such a re-enactment. Would this be fair? My daughter is very young. I think perhaps we'll visit Winchester when she's older. But for now we'll read about Sutton Hoo, (maybe visit) but beyond that will leave the Saxons alone.
Join our Primary Education forum to discuss starting school and helping your child get the most out of it.
Primary education
My eldest loves history, but most of his passion was driven by a decent children's history book, and various Playmobil sets. I have been in real trouble before for trying to Hoover around a re- enactment of the Mark Antony and Cleopatra sea battle thing. He also wrote to the head of Playmobil with his suggestions for an Ancient Greek range (and Wooden Horse etc). He didn't receive a reply.
When we took him to the British Museum, he couldn't get over how accurate the Egyptian stuff was, compared to the Playmobil range.
That's nice.
My little brother would have been the same.
It's just, I'm not sure the OP's DD is the same, is she?
Me too.
OP, it's more a question of watching to see what grabs her, and then encouraging and stretching it. What does she really love doing at the moment?
We're total history-buffs in our house - I'm an archaeologist and whilst we don't do it now, we re-enacted and did historical interpretation to a very high level (clothing to museum-standard, where possible and all that) We took part in prestigious events - both multi and single-period events. Importantly, we did it with our children from a very early age - DD2 was a babe-in-arms and attracted the "ooh, isn't she sweet" comments all the time. We've seen how things are set up and what's out there to engage the fee-paying public across all age groups. We've done talks and interactive events in schools and museums.
Anyway, to cut-to-the-chase...if your child doesn't like it, then why are you doing it? My youngest didn't like the loud noises of battle and she was brought up on it - DD2 doesn't care in the least. So we stopped doing military events. I have to say that very few "living history" sites I've come across, have catered for children under 5, in terms of engaging their interest. Only the very "switched-on" and enlightened/progressive groups recognise the importance of involving children of all ages in a meaningful and interactive way - their own and the public's children 
Why does she need to know the difference between Viking and Saxon food? Children can get a lot from re-enactment - especially good quality, well-researched interpretation but I think that at such a young age, you're pushing it a little in terms of hoping she'll get something from it.
Museum days can be more structured in terms of activities as they can be more "hands-on", more interactive. They have more control over their environment - it's their "bread and butter". Re-enactors have to be incredibly careful with food and sharp, pointy things around the public - they're more restricted in many ways.
Softly-softly, catchee monkey is what I say. Try again later, or perhaps think about going along to the various events held as part of "National Archaeology Day". She's perhaps a little too young for the level you appear to wish to pursue when visiting re-enacments.
BTW - Saxon and Viking periods never did it for me
As an aside and yet still on the subject....DD1 has just come in from work and plonked herself on my laptop. She's read the discussion and said that the best part of re-enacting for her, was the food 
But then I always knew that lol! As re-enactors we were allowed to eat what was cooked and pre-prepared - yummy!
She also loved running around immersing herself in her role....if she chose a role, that is. She learned far more from re-enacting than she did in the classroom and I'm glad to say that she's aware of the mis-informed "stereotypes" and myths that some history books and teachers sadly still perpetuate.
That's not intended to be "teacher-bashing"
She misses it and we'd all do it again in a heartbeat if real life allowed us the time
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
As members of the crowd you can eat depending on the event organisers learnandsay
We weren't allowed to offer the public any food at all and we were always being asked if we could let them try. One of the reasons, was that the budget wasn't set for providing food for the public. We were also told that strict food hygiene laws (food preparation and storage) made it difficult to comply with the local council's rules/guidance. Insurance providers got very "edgy", especially with living histories in the middle of a field, liberally decorated with sheep poo and devoid of fridges lol .
I have no doubt that re-enactment groups do provide food for the public to taste...but I never saw it, even at English Heritage's multi-period spectacular at Kirby Hall. Those with access to modern kitchen facilities and adequate storage may have more leeway
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.