Ha ha! Buffy I was literally just about to say that as soon as I see a post by lib all I read is the whining of an adolescent saying 'but I like looking at boobies and minge', then saw your post.
Lib when we do give evidence for a culture of objectification of women you just ignore it, like the time I posted a list of comments on the Star Page 3 web page and you tried to claim, totally ridiculously, that they were posted by feminists! Jeez! Great argument there! Even a video you posted of a woman talking about how she doesn't believe in objectification had, as one of its first comments, some bloke blethering on about how he loved her boobs. Know what that is? It's objectification. It's a man not engaging with what she is saying but just seeing has a pair of tits to judge whether he likes them or not. There is no need to provide 'evidence' for strip clubs perpetuating this because that is what they are. Serving up women as bits of meat for men who want to see some tits and arse. That's not the same as physical attraction. It's going to a club to see some flesh. Whatever flesh they happen to have laid on for you that night. (And before you say it, no I'm not denying that what the dancers do is very skilled, but that isn't why the punters go. Or the same punters would be going to gym displays etc to see athleticism by men and women that doesn't involve the woman being naked.)
Nobody is trying to speak for all women. Whether all women agree or not doesn't change what is going on. Not everyone believes the world is more than 5,000 years old. So when I say it is I am not speaking for creationists. Doesn't mean it isn't because we don't all agree.
As for banning things. No we don't need to be consistent, we can look at things on a case-by-case basis. Frankly I wouldn't be too upset if Page 3 were banned, some on here will feel the same and some not. But the NMP3 petition is not asking for that, and the campaigners who set it up are not asking for that. No one is lying. I am one signatory on a petition of 119,000+. I would rather Dinsmore agreed to remove it than it were banned. This isn't at all relevant to what is being discussed on this thread anyway.
So Buffy asks why you are not out campaigning at public service cuts that will negatively affect women if you are SO concerned for women's welfare. You reply with what I assume is sarcasm 'I hadn't thought of that', but then go on to prove that no you hadn't thought of that, by going straight back to talk about strip clubs again. You don't give a shit about women's welfare, all you want is more tits'n'ass. The sole reason you carp on about women losing their jobs (which they don't have, the dancers are not employed by the clubs with full employees' rights to sick pay etc) is because it's an easy argument to latch on to rather than just be honest and say 'I just want more tits'n'ass'.
If it is so vital to society to have strip clubs for the sake of people who dance and do bar/security work at them (as if there are no other bar/security jobs!) then what about the poor men who can't earn money this way? I appreciate there are some male strippers, but not as many female as there isn't the same size market for male flesh. Why aren't you posting everywhere all over the internet getting upset about this? All those men being forced into shitty IT jobs or drawing dole or whatever when they could be getting their kit off and being paid? It's a crying shame! Seriously lib you need to get onto this! I mean if these dancers are literally going to starve without the option of removing clothes for men, what about all the men this must be happening to? Will someone think of the poor men?! Oh no. You won't. Because you don't want pecs'n'buns - you want tits'n'ass.