Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Pedants' corner

P's and Q's or Ps and Qs and why?

17 replies

BumperliciousAteTooManyEggs · 25/03/2008 18:19

Just been on another thread and I posted "Ps and Qs" and another poster "P's and Q's". The latter looks right but I don't know why, can anyone explain?

OP posts:
StripeyMama · 25/03/2008 18:23

Ps and Qs.

Cos its a plural. P's and Q's would mean 'belonging to P and Q'

I think...

donnie · 25/03/2008 18:25

plurals do NOT have apostrophes so therefore Ps and Qs is correct.

Saggarmakersbottomknocker · 25/03/2008 18:25

Ps and Qs. Plural.

Wisteria · 25/03/2008 18:26

Well it means pleases and thank yous doesn't it?

so technically it should be P's and 'Q's (possibly) - I doubt whether there is a right or wrong answer.

pruners · 25/03/2008 18:28

Message withdrawn

Wisteria · 25/03/2008 18:29

but you are also missing letters which generally denotes an apostrophe doesn't it?

eg - isn't

Wheelybug · 25/03/2008 18:30

I was going to say with - for the reasons wisteria says, parts of the words are missing so you'd (like in the example of you'd) expect an apostrophe....

But might not be ....

anorak · 25/03/2008 18:30

Yes it's def Ps and Qs. It's a common mistake just like 1940's instead of 1940s, but without apostrophe is correct, because it is a plural.

NotDoingTheHousework · 25/03/2008 18:31

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

BumperliciousAteTooManyEggs · 25/03/2008 18:31

Hmmm, no consensus, I thought there would be a right or wrong answer...

OP posts:
Wisteria · 25/03/2008 18:32

It's an abbreviation though........still slang technically though so not 'right' either way

BumperliciousAteTooManyEggs · 25/03/2008 18:32

Anorak surely that is true if you are saying "in the 1940s" but not if you are saying a "1940's tea dress"?

OP posts:
NotDoingTheHousework · 25/03/2008 18:34

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Wisteria · 25/03/2008 18:35

yes quite but shouldn't it be traditional rules of grammar

NotDoingTheHousework · 25/03/2008 19:01

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Wisteria · 25/03/2008 19:01

yes.........and not for the first time

FarCanal · 26/03/2008 10:05

Wiki is a bit like the Encyclopedia Galactica... it contains much that is apocryphal or wildly innacurate!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread