Opinions needed on whether the punishment fits the crime or not? I can take it!

[tullytwo]

Ok - ds 10 (nearly 11) was caught for the second time on monday night with his nintendo ds under his pillow at night which he then proceeded to lie about having etc.

So we took away privileges - no reading, nintendo or playing out or in with his friends and we would review before dr who on sat.

Wed night he asked if we would consider letting him watch Heroes as we always do and whilst we said to him we would think about it depending on his behaviour dp and I agreed that we would as he seemed to be dealing with the punishment etc well.

Anyway Thurs morn I found some money in his trousers in the laundry basket and asked him if it was the bus money and had he forgotten to hand it all in. He then lied several times over stating it was for a friend etc etc before finally admitting it was the bus money and he had lied as he didnt want to get into trouble for not handing it in.

He had realise his mistake the previous day but hadnt thought to take money in which ok is a bit daft but its the lying again which made me cross as he hasnt seemed to understand that this is what makes us more angry than the original crime.

So he wasnt allowed to watch Heroes. He cried and thumped his bed upstairs which we let go for a short while and then dp told him he needed to calm down and go to sleep.

When we later went up to bed I found he had taken a pencil and gouged scratches with it in the wooden window sill. He was still awake and when asked why he did it he said it was because he was so angry.

So this morning I have calmly explained that he will not be watching Dr Who and that if anything more happens between then that ther will be no Heroes next week either as well as the rest of the punishment and that he needs to learn to control his anger.

I have had to ask dp to stop using physical threats when he gets angry too ( he would never follow through but I dont agree with them at all). He has agreed.

Normally ds is a wonderfully amenable boy and whilst it hurts to do this I really feel we have to follow through with it. Whats the consensus?

[tullytwo]

I only banned reading because I knew it would have an impact on him but I see your point.

Heroes is just the 3 of us watching so is special time for all of us.

[zazen]

It sounds like you have no buy-in from your son -that your style of discipline is 'top-down' and focuses on controlling your DS's behaviour by punishment; not focusing on the main objective of getting along when living together, setting negotiated boundaries, in an open and communicative way.

I found the book "9 Ways to bring out the best in you and your child" by Maggie Reigh brilliant here It's very very good - it gives real and practical tips about what discipline is, and how to apply it: how to avoid the punishment / angry retaliation / breakdown in communication (lying) cycle that you and your family seem to be engaged in at the moment.

This book shows how to focus on your objectives as a family unit living and working together.

HTH.

[edam]

Banning reading is a very odd choice of punishment. And I agree with everyone else that piling punishment on punishment is unfair and will lead to worse behaviour, not better.

What I'd do: demand he hands over the Nintendo at bed time. Bus money - brief telling off for forgetting it, perhaps a post-it note on the front door to remind him to hand it in?

Big conversation about lying, how it's worse than the original mistake BUT you agree that you won't go apeshit if he admits to doing something wrong - he will lie if you make owning up so unpleasant it's worth trying to avoid being found out.

Like Custy's idea about having a discussion with him so he has agreed consequences for fucking up (and then stick to them).

[OrmIrian]

I agree with soapbox. Talk, clear the slate and move on.

My DS#1 lies. I know it and he knows I know it. It started to really upset us and we had a few big bustups about it. But now I have started to stop being quite so controlling about things and there is no need for him to lie. The DS under the pillow is exactly the sort of thing we got cross about and would force DS to lie - so we let that sort of thing go. To a certain extent 11 is an age (mine was 11 in Jan) when they can decide what they do in bed - as long as they are in bed. And now he is being generally more honest - if he knows neither DH nor I are going to rant and punish him for everything, he doesn't need to lie. We do let little lies go - I don't see that he has to lay his entire life bare to his parents - perhaps we all have to learn not to ask. Just need to get DH 100% on board - not quite there, still tends to get overly wound up.

[tullytwo]

Thanks everyone - speaking to dp at lunch time and will let you know what we do!

Feel a lot better after 'talking' about this!

[Lazycow]

I would sit down with him and explain that you have probably taken it too far and that he can watch one of the programmes after all (let him choose which one)

I'd get him to tell you a bit more about why he lies and somehow convince him that lying to you isn't worth it. The problem with punishments generally is that there is no real incentive to tell the truth.

For instance in the original offence your ds obviously wanted to spend more time on the nintendo. He knew he wasn't supposed to but if he owned up to it he was very likely to get some sort of punishment so lying in that instance is so tempting it takes a very stong moral character to tell the truth. Most adults would find it hard, let alone a child.

I think in this instance the issue was his nintendo usage and NOT his lying. The lying was wrong but tbh if he wasn't so scared of the consquences of breaking the rules he'd be less likely to lie.

The money issue is an example of the fact that is is scared to tell you the truth. He couldn't tell you even when all he had done was make a mistake let alone when he had deliberately broken the rules on nintendo usage.

I'd sit down with him and discuss the nintendo usage and try and get him involved with a plan re using it that works for the family. Hve you read how to talk so kids will listen and listen so kids will talk? - this gives a good way to come up with ideas for these sorts of problems.

In the future if he tells you a lie and then finally admits the truth I'd focus on the the original offence and I'd additionally tell him how pleased I was that he eventually told the truth. I wouldn't punish him for lying AT ALL but then unless what he was doing was really bad (stealing, violence etc) I wouldn't do the sort of punishments listed here at all.

I might at a pinch, if he had repeatedly broken the rule, have taken the nintendo away for a week but that would be it. He was playing with the nintendo when he wasn't supposed to so the only punishment would have been removal of the offending object.

I'd re-iterate the rules of the house (which ideally he would have had some input)but I'd also review if they were getting unreasonable. As children grow up some of the rules may need to change.

[scaryteacher]

Tully, I've explained to him that I don't like being lied to and that it upsets me, so that is why he gets told off. For most things that he owns up to, I roll my eyes and tease him,or talk to him about why it's wrong, but if it's deliberate naughtiness, and at 12 he knows what he's doing, then he gets punished.

I've also told him that is he lies to me, I won't be able to believe anything he says so I'll be on his case at school as well as at home, and he may find that embarrassing, and I can be very embarrassing when I choose.

I think he's better now than he was, and that a lot of it is the knee jerk reaction of most kids when they know they may get told off..they do it in school, so it carries over at home. Problem is, they haven't got a whole class they can blame it on at home...

Every time it crops up, and it can only be ds who has done whatever it is, that song springs to mind...'it wasn't me'

[Lazycow]

oops sorry - I see it is all settled now - I am too slow in tying. I hope it all works out.

[KarenThirl]

Haven't had time to read all of this but here goes.

Whenever I give a consequential punishment to ds (9) I usually give him the opportunity to earn back what he's lost. I use SMART goals for this - Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic/Reward Driven, Time specific. In that way he knows exactly what he has to do to make amends and there is no bending of the rules. Usually he'll do whatever he can to earn it back and it avoids us getting into this neverending spiral of punishments for repeat offences. It encourages him to try to improve his behaviour because there's a reward at the end.

So I'd definitely have told him No to Heroes, but given him some specific way of earning Dr Who by behaving in a certain way. I would write them down too, so there can be no misunderstanding. It might include helping to repair the damage to the windowsill, apologing to anyone who was offended by his original behaviour, and making a promise to try not to let it happen again. And I'd review it in a week, and offer a specific reward for improving his behaviour.

Might not work for everyone, but that's how it goes in our house.

[zazen]

Yes, SMART is a good way to go, and is outlined in detail in the book recommended earlier.

Glad this has been sorted!
I guess your username is apt!