My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Other subjects

Do you think our society is over-sexualised?

130 replies

MrsMerryHenry · 20/06/2009 07:31

I have just been reading the chapter on sex in Steve Biddulph's 'Raising Boys', and it got me wondering about this question.

I noticed the stark difference between the UK and a place I've visited in rural Uganda, where there is little to no advertising, let alone magazines, TV, etc etc. I also felt that the people I encountered there had a purity about them, which was incredibly beautiful. In the UK I have only ever seen this in young children - it felt very much like we have lost something, rather than that they are missing out on something we have.

When I came back to London from a two-week jaunt in Uganda I was overwhelmed by how heavily all things sexual are promoted here. It was like being hit in the face time and time again, and then of course I became desensitised to it. But reading Biddulph's book has raised the issue again. I would love to have a thoughtful conversation here about these questions (and more - please do add more questions!):

  1. Is our society oversexualised?
  2. How does it really, truly benefit us to promote sexuality (a) in the way that we do; (b) as heavily as we do?
  3. How does it disbenefit (for want of a better word) us - referring to (a) and (b) as above?
  4. Is there a better alternative?
OP posts:
Report
monkeytrousers · 24/06/2009 09:55

Unfortunalty rape of women OF CHILD BEARING AGE is so common around the world that is constitutes a mean, not an extreme.

Report
monkeytrousers · 24/06/2009 09:51

ST, Its not a mystery why rape is so costly to women - and also why being labelled a rapist is so costly to men - what I'm saying is that the 'rape is a crime of power not sex' slogan bypasses many of these issues, issues that rely on the unique female perspective, rather than a male or gender neutral one.

MMH - right I see what you mean. Thing is, and what needs to be studied further, is that rape may very well be at one end of an extreme spectrum for women, but not for men. Certainly not for men who find themselves in circumstances where being found out and/or punished is negligable - as in places where social order has broken down, or invading armies where the rape of indiginous women has for milennia been a 'legitiamte' spoil of war for the conquering troops and very easy as all the indiginous men are usually away fighting (and in many cases raping) themselves.

This is the gender perspective divide that needs to be carefully scrutinised. Ignoring it does not help women or the battle to get better justice for victims. And it depends on the acceptance of psyscosexual difference, which is somehting cultural constructivists within feminism and the humanites resist to their last breath, sadly.

I also wouldn't call absinence an extreme. It's hard to imagine whgen we live in a culture where sex seems everywhere, but in our pasts, certaily before the pill, and in cultures that basically imprison women or practice polygyny, a great many of the male population are doomed to abstinence. This is why men traditonally go to war. A population will not suffer if 50% of the men die at war, but it will be devestated if 50% of the women went to war and were killed.

So forced abstinence - for men and women is a tyranny, but not abstience by choice.

It's been known for a while that rape by teens is common.

As for what is deviant, you then have to look into psychiatry. Paedophiles for instance show devient sexual preferences, as to men who prey on the elderly. And these victims are more likley to be killed also. There are specific catagorys. Unfortunalty rape of women is so common around the world that is constitutes a mean, not an extreme.

That does not mean that rape is not commited by devient men, I never said that. Devient men do commit devient sexual offences, but the vast majority of rapes are commited by 'normal' men, although life history, subjective life expectancy (how long the person themselves expects to be around, all contrubute to high risk taking behavior, of which rape is one.

Not sure what you mean by maternal/paternal relationships Hobbgoblin, but live history theory is part of how my particular discipline looks at rape, if that's what you mean, which looks at a variety of factors from the rapists life history as above and measures for corrolates.

MMH, you are very right of course. Men are raped, and in huge numbers in prisons. In environmenst where men congrigate togther and practive their sexuality inhindered by women the amount of sex that goes on, consentual and non consentual is staggering.

You may bet that they are more traumatised than women but you are guessing. There is no dount that men will be traumatised from the assault, but there are essential factors that they do not have to deal with that women do, which makes neglecting the gender element bad for women searching for justice. The stats speak for themselves on that.

I am not attempting to charaterise the debaet as men vs women - I am always ploughing the middle ground in my arguments. Saying men and women are different does not dichotomise them or their issues.

Report
ABetaDad · 24/06/2009 09:05

SenoraPostrophe - you seem to have misunderstood my post and I am sorry that happened. All I am talking about is how to give real practical help to my own still young DSs when they suddenly become confused teenagers struggling with their own feelings, hormones and the added pressure from the sexualisation of society. Something that none of us here really had to cope with when we were growing up. Nothing more than that.

I feel scaryteacher/MrsMerryHenry interpeted what I said in the way I meant my posts to be read and have similar concerns to me. I have found their answers very helpful and honest.

I cannot believe a discussion was had about a 13 year old boy being 'misogynist' when talking privately to his mum about his own confused feelings about a girls body which he only accidentally saw a part of. All credit to him and scaryteacher that the discussion even took place.

Hobgoblin - you to have been very honest too and have pretty much summed up where I am in my thinking.

"how to teach our sons respect for women and how that must make us consider how not to become too precious about doing so. I don't know how to achieve this. It isn't to desxualise one's thoughts regarding girls/women and it isn't to demand that our daughters watch how they dress so as not to give boys mixed messages."

My basic feeling is I am going to tell my DSs what scaryteacher has told her son. Wait until after 16 and then only do it if you and the other person are absolutely sure and have made absolutely clear to each other you want to. I will add, that they should ignore what everyone else says they should be doing. The decision is theirs and the other persons alone and no one else has a say in that. Remember also that 'no always means no' and use contraception every time.

Report
SenoraPostrophe · 23/06/2009 23:12

MrsMH - yes I did, sorry. lines blurring together.

and no, I wasn't referring to you.

Report
hobbgoblin · 23/06/2009 23:09

That would be very interesting MrsMH ,look forward to possibly hearing your friend's thoughts, and yours!

Good thread btw.

Report
MrsMerryHenry · 23/06/2009 23:02

Umm...Senora, you said 'MT' but I think you meant me?

OP posts:
Report
SenoraPostrophe · 23/06/2009 23:01

MT - I wasn't referring to your posts, I was referring to posts by ABetaDad and scaryteacher (ABT said that all men are "naturally programmed" to respond to certain signals and that he worried about this for his sons, and st said lots of stuf about young teenage girls being deliberatley "provocative").

I do however disagree with your suggestion that rape is not committed by deviant men. you might not be able to spot them all, but you couldn't necessarily spot other kinds of sadists either. Or deviants, for that matter.

I also think that emphasising the gender aspect of rape is counter-productive. Men are raped, and I bet they are just as traumatised as women. If we characterise the argument as men v women, we risk alienating the very people who let so many rapists off the hook.

I agree with your comments about the trauma of rape though.

Report
MrsMerryHenry · 23/06/2009 22:55

Oh, and I'm not ignoring your earlier posts - still considering your comments, aksherly.

OP posts:
Report
MrsMerryHenry · 23/06/2009 22:55

Hobb, if my parenting counsellor friend gets a chance to look at this thread she might have some researched info on this. I agree with you that there must be a familial connection as well as other causes.

OP posts:
Report
hobbgoblin · 23/06/2009 22:49

I've been reading up a bit on rape and the psychology behind it but can only find so far stuff on violence and rape. I was hoping to find some info on correlation between type of maternal and paternal relationships with perpetrator but have not been able to do so. Maybe I am looking for something that isn't there, but I doubt it.

Report
MrsMerryHenry · 23/06/2009 21:58

"Rape isn't a pathlogy. It isn't purpetrated by only deviant men." - at the risk of courting controversy, I'm not sure that all non-sexual violence is perpetrated only by deviant men, either. Which brings us to the question: What is 'deviant'?

OP posts:
Report
MrsMerryHenry · 23/06/2009 21:56

mt, I think you've slightly misunderstood me - the word 'violence' in this context is confusing as it has two meanings. Words can be violent, even when spoken softly. When I describe rape as being violent I am not referring to acts that one would describe as 'a violent rape'. I am saying that rape in itself, no matter how aggressively it's committed, is an act of violence - emotional, physical, psychological, sexual, etc. As I said earlier, rape and the causes of it are complex.

When I said 'a viable comparison' I probably chose the wrong words. What I'm saying is that in the context of a discussion about how to help our children develop a healthy, considerate and positive attitude towards sexuality, rape is at the extreme - it's a bit like when some posters mentioned sexual repression, at the other extreme of the spectrum if you like. If someone came on here and said we should start promoting sexual absinence to our teens, I'd consider it an unhelpful contribution, as, I'm sure, would most posters. If one can say there's a spectrum of sexual behaviours, I'd put abstinence and rape at opposite ends. And again, I'm prepared to be proven wrong.

Having said that, dittany's article does show that committing rape is not out of bounds for teenagers....

OP posts:
Report
scaryteacher · 23/06/2009 21:53

I would imagine that women are so traumatised by rape because it is an internal assault rather than an external one; because they are being forced to do something that perhaps normally they would share with a partner; because it will have a knock-on effect on their relationships/ marriages; because they could possibly get pregnant/ get AIDS/ get an STD from this which extends the trauma; because the rapist is unlikely to use a condom and will leave semen inside them; because it may cause internal damage; their choices are being removed from them; because it makes you vulnerable and leaves you feeling dirty.

Report
monkeytrousers · 23/06/2009 21:29

I'm not sure what you mean by a viable comparison. You mean the rape stats as compared to ?

Rape is very often not violent in technical terms though MMH. That makes it even harder for a woman to get justice if it is catogorised as 'an extreme expression of violence'. The violence is predominely psychological not physical.

That's why the law has changed whereby it is no longer necessary for a women to put up 'reasonable force' as many women were too petrified to fight back and even today have less chancve of being believd if they don't claim to fight to within an inch of their lives.

Rape isn't a pathlogy. It isn't purpetrated by only deviant men. If that were true we'd all be able to spot a rapist by daylight, never mind marrying one!

Rape is a sexual crime more often than it is a violent one. That makes it even more traumatic for the victim becasue it is less easy to understand. Trying to simplify it as a crime of violence and power - taking the sex out of it altogether - is oart of the problem I think. If we knew why women were so traumatised by rape, as opposed to other assaults for instance, what is it that is unique to women and their fear and palpable trauma after rape, rather than cancelling that question out as if it were meaningless. I think it is the crux. If we begin to appreciate rape in law from a woman's presepctive I mean, not from a male or gender free perspective, we might begin to get better justice for victims. That's my hope anyway.

Report
MrsMerryHenry · 23/06/2009 21:14

Senora: "I do not accept the earlier suggestions that men have a kind of natural instinct in that direction" - I hope you're not referring to my posts here. If so, you've misunderstood them. If not...as you were!

mt - I still disagree that rape is a viable comparison to make in this discussion as it's an extreme expression of violence. I may be wrong here, but as I see it, it's a bit like saying gambling is wrong because it's addictive. We know that in fact a person who has an inclination towards addictive behaviour will express that behaviour through any of an infinite number of channels: alcohol, gambling, sex, shopping, etc etc. As far as I can see, rape is the same - a person who has an inclination towards violent behaviour will express that behaviour through any of an infinite number of channels, including, sadly, sex. The causes rape are not simply a society's attitudes to sex; it's far more complex than that.

I'm prepared to be proven wrong on this, though!

OP posts:
Report
monkeytrousers · 23/06/2009 21:01

rather than them actually havbing more sex, IYSWIM. There are a lot of men who get nada. More men than women certainly.

Report
monkeytrousers · 23/06/2009 21:00

I think it terms were a bit confusing - wasn't it somehting like 'do men have a stronger sex drive' which is different (IMO) to 'do men want sex more often with different partners'. What we know about this is that men say they certainly fantisise abnout having more anonymous sex than women do, and that they are the major consumers of prostitutes and porn, which lets them live that fantasy.

Report
SenoraPostrophe · 23/06/2009 20:50

"" wonder whether porn, prostitution, and so on would lose any of its appeal if it became more accepted and less 'underground'..."

eh? I thought it was quite widely accepted. and indeed, the accessibility of soft porn featuring abnormally-proportioned models is something that I am worried about.

But that is a very separate thing from young girls wearing short skirts - I will not call it "dressing provocatively" because that description in itself seems to imply that dressing this way is to deliberately invite rape, which is ridiculous. I do not accept the earlier suggestions that men have a kind of natural instinct in that direction. but everyone just ignores me anyway...

Report
monkeytrousers · 23/06/2009 20:32

"" wonder whether porn, prostitution, and so on would lose any of its appeal if it became more accepted and less 'underground'..."

I don't think it would actually. I suspect it functions on its over level of equilibrium, but that the mean is pretty close to what we see. Prostitution rates don't go down when it's legalised fror instance.

Report
monkeytrousers · 23/06/2009 20:29

MrsHernry - "mt - I'm all for considering dangerous ideas! Do you have any further info about your theory - maybe a society you know of with this sort of relationship with sexuality?"

The only info I am going on are broad stats across Europe as opposed to Africa. Rape is a huge problem in Africa - the stats are turly obscene really. In the middle east it's difficut to gather reliable stats as marital rape isn't classed as a crime so isn't recorded. In areas of poverty or recent disaster rape stats shoot up too. As unsatisfactory as our stats are in the west, they are pretty good in comparision to the rest of the world.

I just wondered if a fairly liberal attitude to sex was a significant corrolate. But like I say would have to test it. I haven't a clue so it would be v intersting to see what the results were.

Report
OrmIrian · 23/06/2009 20:26

" wonder whether porn, prostitution, and so on would lose any of its appeal if it became more accepted and less 'underground'..."

yes hobb. I beleive (and hope) it would.

Report
ABetaDad · 23/06/2009 20:11

Just come back from a whole day out and glad and grateful that everyone is still chewing over these questions - and garlic bread.

I'm still reading with interest and may well post later when I have had a good think.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

scaryteacher · 23/06/2009 20:07

I was talking to my ds about this thread tonight and trying to explain the potential minefield that awaits on the 'does no mean no?' debate. We've decided that the safest way to play it (for when he is older) is that no always means no. We then had the, 'but does no always mean no when it's you and Dad?' Trying to explain the subtle nuances of a 23 year old marriage whilst chomping on garlic bread before going back to marking GCSEs was challenging!

Report
hobbgoblin · 23/06/2009 19:28

I love monkey's suggestion. This is mainly because I believe in fairly unfettered sexual expression with the obvious clause that other involved parties are consenting, unharmed, etc. etc.

I wonder whether porn, prostitution, and so on would lose any of its appeal if it became more accepted and less 'underground'...

Thinking about ABetaDad's questions on how to teach our sons respect for women and how that must make us consider how not to become too precious about doing so. I don't know how to achieve this. It isn't to desxualise one's thoughts regarding girls/women and it isn't to demand that our daughters watch how they dress so as not to give boys mixed messages.

We already see how the 'no means no' message is confused and sometimes exploited.

I still come back to my old argument about self esteem. If girls have low self esteem then you will sometimes see manipulation (of all sorts not just sexual) of men and likewise boys may respond to low self esteem issues with aggressive and dominating behaviours which can cross over to sexual behaviour.

I need to say more but have baguettes burnign in oven...

Report
MrsMerryHenry · 23/06/2009 18:55

Dittany, the reason you come across as anti-male is the stark absence of positive statements about males and your unquestioningly positive statements about females. Would you now like to balance out your posts? Perhaps you could describe the positive ways in which males engage with women, with regard to sex and sexuality.

You have also completely ignored my repeated statements that girls' teasing is about dress and behaviour, apparently so as to confirm your own assumptions. And you've whitewashed over the fact that I have said both boys and girls can harm each other - or do you think it's only men who cause the ills of the world? You do come across as someone who has been harmed in some way by males and is still very bruised and hurting. If this is the case it's no wonder that your views on gender issues are so partisan, and I can only express my sympathy for any pain you may be suffering. However, to get back to the focus of this thread, once you allow yourself more open-minded thinking on sex and gender we can have a sensible discussion about it.

mt - I'm all for considering dangerous ideas! Do you have any further info about your theory - maybe a society you know of with this sort of relationship with sexuality?

I agree with scaryteacher that it's a good thing for a 13-year-old boy to see girls as people rather than exclusively as sex objects, especially when there's so much material available persuading him towards teh latter. The push-pull thing which you described is also true; it's like when teen boys have 'little kid' bodies but deep voices - they straddle manhood and boyhood concurrently for quite a while, don't they? I also agree that the 'turkey' comment is really not a big deal, and certainly not misogynist.

OP posts:
Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.