1. Before reading the research what was your perception of white bread?
My perception of white bread was that it is a poor-quality source of simple carbohydrates and that the mass-produced stuff contains all sorts of additives, fats and enzymes that wouldn’t be found in homemade bread and I wouldn’t really want to consume on a regular basis.
2. Having looked at this research and key findings from Leeds university (based on a study of 2,500 children), have your perceptions changed at all? If so how? If not, why not?
Not really. While the study showed that white bread does have a higher nutritional value than I had supposed, it also showed that high bread intake was linked with high intake of fat and salt. I think that the macronutrients, vitamins and minerals found in white bread can be better accessed through foods higher in complex carbohydrates and lower fat and salt contents.
3. Which, if any, of the key research findings really resonate with you and why?
The recommendations for adding nutrients to bread (zinc, vitamin A, vitamin D and fibre for white bread) resonated with me. To me, it indicates that (1) it's difficult to give children a diet that naturally meets all of their nutritional needs, and (2) white bread could be better if only it was more like… wholemeal bread. I know 50/50 bread has been brought in to try to give more nutrients to children who prefer white bread but it’s surely better to give them wholemeal bread in the first place.
4. Do you think white bread gets a bad reputation or not? Why do you think this is?
It probably does have a bad reputation but that doesn’t seem to stop it being the most popular type of bought bread. I think the popularity of low/no-carb diets and higher consumer awareness of the Chorleywood process, glycaemic index values and what constitutes a healthy diet and more interest about what actually goes into processed food mean that white bread is regarded with some suspicion.
5. The research shows "children's bread consumption increases intakes of some nutrients which have been proven to be beneficial for long term health, including carbohydrate, starch, fibre, calcium, iron and selenium" how aware, if at all, of this were you before reading the research?
I was aware that bread contained useful nutrients, although I did regard white bread as empty calories apart from the nutrients that are added in e.g. vitamin B and calcium.
6. Do you give your DCs packed lunches for school? If so, how often, if at all does the packed lunch include a sandwich and which type of bread do they usually have? Do you think you're likely to change this after reading the research or not? If so why? If not why not?
Yes, my 3 year-old son takes a packed lunch to nursery. He doesn’t like sandwiches so he has pasta instead. At home, he has a mix of white seeded bread and wholegrain seeded bread as toast. After reading the research, I am going to stop giving him white bread. I was giving it to him because other mums told me that wholegrains shouldn’t be given to toddlers because they fill up on them at the expense of other foods on their plate, but having read the study and done further research, I’m convinced that the nutritional value of white bread is comparatively low compared to other foods and far outweighed by the high salt and fat content. In the discussion part of the study, it said that ‘fibre intake was lower than recommended for many children even if they did consume bread’, which indicates to me that wholegrains are necessary to achieve a recommended level of fibre intake. Looking at comparison tables of the nutrients mentioned above (fibre, calcium, iron and selenium), wholegrain bread contains much higher levels of each of these nutrients except calcium. My son is happy to eat wholegrain bread and I’m now confident to encourage that as part of a balanced diet.
7. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following: "Parents have a tough job when it comes to children's health and nutrition"? Please explain.
I definitely do agree. There are so many conflicting messages about what constitutes a healthy diet for adults that it is a struggle to know what is a good diet for a child, especially children of pre-school age like my son and daughter. Their nutritional needs, especially in terms of fat intake, are so different from what is marketed as a healthy diet that it’s hard to strike a balance between giving them foods that contain the right levels of vitamins and minerals and making sure that those foods are high enough in energy content. Industry-driven ‘recommendations’ really don’t help. Five portions of different fruit and vegetable a day, three portions of dairy, three servings of wholegrain, two portions of fish a week, one portion of oily fish… how do you fit it all in?
At the same time, foods that are of low comparative nutritional value are relentlessly marketed at children. I take my children food shopping with me and this week I was picking up porridge oats while my 3 year-old was asking for the ‘happy face’ sugar puffs. Yesterday in a café I ordered a glass of milk for him while he was staring at a brightly-coloured bottle of squash shaped like an animal. While my children are tiny it’s easy to say no and to control their diet but marketing works and they won’t be tiny forever.
Add in toddler fussiness and it’s amazing they eat anything I give them at all really!