My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Find out all about large family cars, holidays and more right here.

Larger families

How many kids is too many kids?

111 replies

keeleyandconor · 31/07/2012 23:06

I was just wondering what you all thought about the amount of children people have. How many is too many? Do you think there is a certain amount that is acceptable but others that aren't? I ask this question because I am a mother of fifteen, 3 girls and 12 boys, of the ages 18, 17, 15, 15, 15, 14, 13, 12, 8, 8, 6, 4, 2, 10 months and 10 months. We have faced a lot of opinions about how big our family is, not all opinions nice or fair, most not in fact. I know that we are very, very happy with the family we have, how many there are of us, if we weren't happy then we wouldn't have had any more children, would we? It suits our families personalities, lifestyle, etc, perfectly. I understand everybody has their own views, but please try and keep them nice, on topic and constructive, but I would love to know what you all think, and how many children you do have or would/wouldn't have. Thank you :)

OP posts:
Report
Mollydoggerson · 20/09/2012 14:18

I think the more you have, the less time and energy each individual child gets.

It totally depends on finances, energy levels, space between each child.

I wonder why people want more and more and more, what will the next one bring that the last one didn't, and if there is always a baby in the house who will require alot of attention, threen the older ones just have to put up with less parental time. I don't understand the need to have more, when it must be more and more difficult to actually enjoy rearing the first 6/7/8/9.

Report
Littleraysofsunshine · 25/09/2012 12:50

I am intrigued, I have two dd's under two. We've both always wanted a big family. How do you manage the individual time for each child? Just wondered. I think us fan. As long as each child feels unconditionally loved then that's all that matters. Of course money is a factor but its not the be all and end all. As long as you're all happy. That's all that counts.

Report
Littleraysofsunshine · 25/09/2012 12:51

Sets of twins and triplets that's amazing. Our bodies are amazing! :) I take my hat off to anyone with children that are raising them with love and affection. And even more so to Those who have huge families like op Grin

Report
willyoulistentome · 25/09/2012 12:59

What Kewcumber said.....

I do have a bit of a beef with a Mum of 5 at my kids school though. Her kids are all lovely, they are pretty popular and so get invited to lots of other kids houses for playdates. She, however, hardly ever reciprocates, as she is 'too busy'. This I can sort of understand-ish - I do think it's a bit rude though. I think she should make some time for it. Despite having had one of her sons and one of her daughters round to ours numerous times, neither of my two ever get invited back and it upsets them. I have had to explain Why, but it still upsets them. I haven;t stopped inviting her kids though as it's not their fault.

So she gets her kids looked after and fed frequently, but never bothers to return the favour, even though she doesn't work and the family is fairly well off...so I think SHE has too many!!

Report
orangeberries · 26/09/2012 13:17

Some children in my children's class have never reciprocated invites, one in particular who is very good friends with my son and is at our house at least once a month has never had him round once. I think that's just the way some people are. (They have 2 children).

I agree with all the others who say that as long as you are up to it emotionally and can afford it financially, there is no real limit is there? Also very importantly expectations as to what you consider acceptable to give up on.

For example for me going back to my own country to see my family is what I consider necessary to do at least 3 times a year and the cost of this has increased and now with 4 children I think I am at my limit. I also want to the children to have sufficient space in the house to have their own things, and we are also at our limit in our current house with 4.

Finally, I also like for the children to pursue activities out of school and again with 4 I am at my limit!

If I didn't have family abroad, I would be happy with camping or something more accessible, which probably would give me more money for a bigger house and more children! So everyone's circumstances vary greatly!!!

Report
Littleraysofsunshine · 26/09/2012 22:15

How do you find it OP?Smile

Report
deleted203 · 29/09/2012 04:56

I've got 5 kids and would happily have had lots more (had 4 miscarriages after last). As many children as you like provided, as others have said, you are working and supporting them.

Jessie you say you and DH were only 17 but did everything yourselves. Do I take it that he was working and earning enough to keep you all?

Report
whoopsfailedagain · 30/09/2012 17:24

Well we have 10dc (altogether) I met dh when he had 5dc (2 were his step children) and I had 4, then we had 1 together! Soooo 17,17,15,14,13,12,11,9,5&1!

I've given birth to 5 and my body knows it. I personally have 4 boys and with dss in the house permanently it makes 5. Me and dd get a bit boyed out sometimes! But then dh's dds come over and readdress the balance. Ideally I'd love to have just one more but I think I'm done really! Sad dh is 40 next year Sad

Report
whoopsfailedagain · 30/09/2012 17:30

willy I struggle with playmates too! The reason being that if one has a friend over they all have to so it's fair. Easier now with the older ones as they entertain themselves, but I did used to struggle with the younger ones. I also work full time and sometimes from home. Although my kids understand mummy needs to get on, others don't understand it. It's not fair on them really. In fact though, ds is in yr1 and has never been invited since being at school. I think in reality a lot of parents struggle with that if they are working.

Report
bamboostalks · 30/09/2012 17:31

Personally I cannot imagine trying to meet the emotional needs of 10 children in today's society. Anything over 6 is too many IMO. There are not enough hours in the day even if you bury your own needs entirely. Possibly in some sort of countryside wealthy eutopia? With staff to help and ferry them round.

Report
whoopsfailedagain · 30/09/2012 17:41

I can see I might take this thread a little too personally, but In my vast experience children from larger families are less likely to be emotionally needy. Mine are string independent children, who've learnt to share, take in turns and consider other people's needs as well as their own. My nephew (a only child Pfb) has been known to be quite a spoilt brat, so are his emotional needs being met?

Report
Flojo1979 · 30/09/2012 17:47

How on earth do u meet the emotional needs of 15 kids?
I have 2 kids and I struggle to give my older one the attention he needs because the toddler is always hanging off me.
Do u rely a lot on the older ones to play parenting too?

Report
scottishmummy · 30/09/2012 17:49

it's not an exact number as such
too many is can't emotionally,mentally,or financially cope
and unable to adequately parent.some folks should stop at one frankly

Report
jellybeans · 30/09/2012 17:56

I think it is up the individual. We have 5 and can just about afford it on DH's wages and me staying home. We pay for brownies, swimming etc and trips, holidays but probably cannot afford a 6th and do all these things as we do now. In all honesty though I would not have anymore even if we could as it is very hard trying to meet all their needs and give them enough attention. Also space etc is an issue unless you have a huge house.

Report
margerykemp · 30/09/2012 18:02

If they are really spaced out then usually some of the older ones have left home by the time the youngest ones are born so say 10 in total is different from 10 under 16year old IFSWIM?

Report
jellybeans · 30/09/2012 18:11

willyoulistentome I wondered if you were talking about me at first! It annoys me when people invite my kids to their house far too often and then expect me to reciprocate. I think it should be occasional and not weekly or more. If others want more and the same back they should seek out like minded parents.

I do have DC's friends round for tea and sleep overs. But more monthly than weekly because I take it in turns with the 5 and have a very busy life. DD has a friend whose mother made a comment about me not having her child much but what she didn't realise is that my DD always chose to have another friend as the other girl (her daughter) was always 'moody and mean' to her. So there may be more to it. Maybe she can sense your judging of her.

In addition being a SAHM doesn't mean you have loads of time. Some of us care for elderly relatives and other such things. It's hard to understand the demands of five if you only have two in all honesty. Many of my friends who have 4+ agree on this, its a real bug bear.

Invite other kids but don't expect them to have yours back! I don't when I invite people. Some people don't like it or can only cope occasionally for a whole host of reasons. Stop inviting the kid if you are so bothered. It bugs me when people invite my kid 3 times a week! I do want to see them! I also know they are doing it for THEM and not me or my child. It keeps their kid busy and out their hair. But mine are happy playing amongst themselves so I don't need to add other kids to the mix. I do it for my kids and don't care if the person doesn't invite mine back. Occasional invites back are fine! Not everyone has same views on playdates as you you know!

Report
mumof2girls99 · 05/12/2012 17:13

i only have 2 children but ttc number 3 just thought id pop in i dont think that it matters how many dc someone has i wouldnt say that a certain number is to many i love big familys i grew up with a 2 step sisters

Report
NAR4 · 06/12/2012 12:01

I actually found that invites to come home with us after school, were constantly turned down because other parents thought I wouldn't be able to cope with their child as well. Personally I found this insulting and wouldn't have invited them if this was the case. I very rarely invite others to our home now unless I know them very very well. I find others peoples judgements upsetting, far too often.

Although I personally feel that parents should be able to support all their children financially, we all have differrent opinions. If the children are loved and cared for, then have as many as you like.

I take my hat off to you for managing to care for so many, especially in the (I imagine hectic) time where you had a child a year following the triplets.

Report
zzzzz · 07/12/2012 13:30

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

zzzzz · 07/12/2012 14:19

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ILoveDolly · 10/12/2012 14:28

Wow! 15, eh?! I have three and will scream if I have another person say to me 'you've got your hands full'. Maddening. But seriously, I don't know how parents of large families (more than 4 IMO) manage. All my kids are sick today, I had no sleep as baby was in bed with us - he is really unwell and miserable. It's my birthday. Happy days. I spent it at the GP and wading in tissues. Three seems like my limit!!

Report
varicoseveined · 12/12/2012 11:39

Only 2 children, would like a third but for health and other reasons it doesn't look likely...

No matter what you have - childless, one, two, 20, someone will want to stick their oar in!

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

BlackholesAndRevelations · 13/12/2012 21:13

Blimey. 15 is a bit excessive in terms of a)the planet's sustainability; b) the cost (you'd have to be a millionaire surely, to be able to afford to look after so many? And if they are paid for by the state, that's wrong in my book). I get very angry when people who are on benefits harp on about their "right" to have as many children as they want. Very entitled. I know many, many people who'd love more but can't afford them.

Report
PrincessScrumpy · 18/12/2012 14:19

Just need to jump in and say I hate the environmental argument - it's such a load of nonsense... one of my dc may discover an alternative energy, or some other scientific answer to save the planet, without them the world may be doomed! Grin

Personally if you can afford them then fine.

Report
OhSantaClaussOhOh · 18/12/2012 14:36

Well as a guideline, how many children is too much will depend a lot on who the parents are.

I really wanted 3 dcs, that was my number. 4 felt like too much (esp because I felt I wouldn't have been able to give them the time they needed on a individual basis).
DP felt that one was plenty. He reluctantly agreed to 2 and that was too much for him, esp when they were little. Too much noise, too much mess, too much demands on his time.

I have to say for me 15 is ... well another world all together. I expect that the logistics, the organisation and how much time you can afford to give to each child isn't completely different than in a family of 1 or 2 like mine. Which might not be a bad thing as someone pointed out before lol.
I think I am more Shock and Confused as to how you managed to have another child less than 2 years after having triplets. Seeing how hard I found 2 dcs under 2, I can't fantom having 4 under 2yo. But as I say, that's just me who would never have been able to raise to the challenge.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.