My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

News

Farewell to the NHS, 1948-2013: a dear and trusted friend finally murdered by Tory ideologues

60 replies

ttosca · 31/03/2013 22:32

This week's 'reforms' of a treasured institution - by people who came to power promising not to mess with it - is yet another sickening assault on the poor by the rich

---



Nothing is more gut-wrenching than watching a close friend dying in front of you. And I mean beyond close: a friend who brought you into the world, helped raise you, and was there whenever you were most desperately in need. So, spare a moment for our National Health Service. Time of death: midnight, 1st April 2013. Cause of death: murder.

That this will strike many as hyperbole is because the assault on the NHS is one of the most scandalously under-reported issues in modern British history. Newsnight actually devoted a piece to scrutinising the privatisation of an institution once described by Tory Chancellor Nigel Lawson as ?the nearest thing the English have to a religion?.

Only two years too late, then. Frequently, the attack is presented on the Government?s own terms: as the simple devolution of power to doctors and patients. Cuts of up to £20bn by 2015 are spun as ?savings?. And who can disagree with ?savings??

A charitable explanation would be the sheer complexity of the Tory assault. The Health and Social Care Act is more than three times longer than the legislation that established the NHS in the first place. When I asked journalists adamantly opposed to the Tory plans why they had failed to adequately cover this travesty, they sheepishly responded it was too complicated: it went over their heads.

Cynical though it may be, that so many of those running our glorious ?free? media are covered by private health insurance should not be ignored either.

From today, strategic health authorities and primary care trusts are formally abolished. Some £60bn of the NHS budget is now in the hands of clinical commissioning groups, supposedly run by GPs. This is a sham, though one which turns local doctors into human shields for the privatisers. In reality, the vast majority of GPs will keep on doing what they do already ? looking after patients ? while commissioning will be managed by private companies.

It?s worse than that. Under the Government?s Section 75 regulations ? even after they were revised after huge political pressure ? all NHS services must be put out to competitive tender unless the commissioning groups are satisfied a ?single provider? can deliver that service. But as the British Medical Journal has asked, how can they ?be sure there is only one possible provider except by undertaking an expensive tender??

Indeed, were they to refrain from doing so, they would risk a costly legal battle. As over a thousand doctors and nurses warned last month, the regulations will ?force virtually every part of the English NHS to be opened up to the private sector?. A free-for-all in the English NHS beckons.

As Dr Lucy Reynolds, a research fellow at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, puts it, ?the public sector will shrink away, and the private sector will grow?. All NHS hospitals will be forced to become foundation hospitals, laying the ground for them to be pushed into the private sector. That process is happening to my own local hospital, the Whittington Hospital, which is selling £17m worth of assets and faces 230 fewer beds and 570 job losses.

Let?s be clear what it at stake: services, people?s health and even lives. As Professor Terence Stephenson of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges put it last week, doctors? warnings had been ignored, and ?unnecessary competition [would] destabilise complex, interconnected local health economies, in particular hospitals, potentially having adverse effects on patient services?.

And a warning from a leading member of a profession not known for overstating a case: patients could be ?in danger from complications? from a fragmented NHS. Resources will no longer be distributed on the basis of need: the rules of the market now rule supreme. ?It?s chaos, really,? says Brian James, until recently chief executive of the Rotherham Foundation Trust. Small and medium-sized hospitals will be ?bankrupted by the market and more will be pulled into the big teaching hospitals?.

The great sell-off of our NHS is already well under way. Virgin Care now run more than 100 NHS services across the country, from radiology departments to GP clinics. Last year, they were given a £100m contract to run services in Surrey, and a £130m contract to run key NHS services for young people in Devon. Not that you?d know, of course: services run by the profiteering vultures circling ahead operate under the NHS logo, hiding privatisation from public view.

Just where is the opposition? Labour, the mother of the NHS, is hobbled by its own record. Although it injected desperately needed cash into our health services when last in power, New Labour helped to lay the foundations for this Tory offensive. Former Labour Health Secretary Frank Dobson once condemned government plans to contract out commissioning, ?with private companies handing work to private hospitals... If that wouldn?t amount to privatisation, I don?t know what would.?

But that was 2006, and it was Tony Blair in office. The disaster of New Labour?s Private Finance Initiative ? the equivalent of buying public services on a credit card ? has left hospitals saddled with debts of £79bn. Hospital trusts face bankruptcy as a result.

Labour?s own health spokesperson, Andy Burnham, has commendably pledged to repeal the Tories? NHS Act. But let?s not forget that the last time they were in opposition, Labour pledged to renationalise the railways: on assuming office, it was deemed politically impossible. That must not happen again, and pressure must be brought on the Labour leadership to reject their own past.

The Tories didn?t have the guts to put their proposals before the electorate. Despite its flaws, the NHS had record levels of public satisfaction before the Tories began systematically dismantling it. You need only look to the US ? where their inefficient market-driven system consumes twice as much of GDP as our NHS ? to see the superiority of publicly-run healthcare. New Labour?s own privatisation doubled the cost of administration in our NHS.

It was Nye Bevan (pictured above, in 1948) who said ?The NHS will last as long as there are folk left with the faith to fight for it?. It is with huge regret that I must say that ? however much faith we have ? we did not fight to save it. The NHS has been killed, murdered, assassinated by a Tory government. The question now is ? do we have enough faith to bring it back to life?

www.independent.co.uk/voices/farewell-to-the-nhs-19482013-a-dear-and-trusted-friend-finally-murdered-by-tory-ideologues-8555503.html

OP posts:
Report
YellowandGreenandRedandBlue · 01/04/2013 09:44

So basically you agree with Cameron's decisions. Just say that. This is why no one respects politicians, because they don't just say it straight.

They didn't have to take this step. It was a choice.

Report
YellowandGreenandRedandBlue · 01/04/2013 09:47

And yes, the 'savings' argument is a fiction.

Report
AuntieStella · 01/04/2013 09:53

I didn't say I agreed with these decisions. Just pointed out that they would not have been possible in this timeframe had they not been in total harmony with the preceding Labour actions.

The 'nastiness' needs to be attributed to Labour too (perhaps more so, as they were the innovator of direct private provision within NHS).

All reorganisations in NHS release far less resource than predicted: that's a given, and has been true for decades.

Report
YellowandGreenandRedandBlue · 01/04/2013 10:01

Accepting the choices were possible due to what preceded them, I can't understand whether you are saying the current government were a) right or b) wrong to take the decisions they did post 2010.

I say the government was wrong, what do you say Auntie Stella?

I get sick of long detailed historical analysis sometimes, it is one of the things that most turns people off politics.

Sometimes it comes down to yes/no, right/wrong.

Report
auforfoulkesake · 01/04/2013 10:06

I agree that shit staff seem hard to get rid of, they are re-employed elsewhere, but how can their level of productivity be judged?

Report
hotbot · 01/04/2013 10:11

Madame, the nhs needs to cherish its good managers , who take incompetent staff to task, it is naive to suggest that in the new wave good staff will be rewarded, they won't they will be srcrewed along wit the patients we are supposed to serve. . as for procurement, i agree up to a point, well actually. Big point, but do we want to go back to reps snoozing consultants, I for one am also wearing a black armband,
Pfi etc has cost us millions the politicians should be ashamed.

Report
BoysAreLikeDogs · 01/04/2013 10:24

what is the meaning of AstroTurf in the context used on this thread please Auntie Stella?

Report
JustinBsMum · 01/04/2013 15:30

The NHS is creaking and groaning at the seams. It cannot go on as it is with increasing numbers of elderly, more and more expensive drugs being developed and expected by patients, better service expected by customers who are more demanding and less respectful of staff.

Any dealings I have had over my lifetime have been occasionally wonderful (surgeon, surgery) often good (gps) but usually mediocre (a/e, nursing care, staff too busy chatting to give a shit).

It is prob because I have lived abroad and seen what service you get elsewhere. Polite attentive staff, v professional staff, there to do a job as quickly and efficiently as poss, not to catch up on last night's tv with their cronies, cleanliness and matter of fact info and advice.

Expecting people to wait 5 hours to be treated (A/E) is not service imo. It is a joke. Chucking barrow loads of medication at people for free for decades is ludicrous. Filling a ward with elderly patients, many with dementia, then expecting a couple of nurses to cope is farcical.

Something has to change before the system collapses.

Report
Sunnywithshowers · 01/04/2013 15:43

I agree with Stella somewhat. New Labour started putting in place the mechanisms that allowed the current changes. The Tories are merely administering the coup de grace. [busad]

I think the Labour party died in 1997 to be replaced by 'Tory-lite'. There is no party I want to vote for these days.

Report
Chipstick10 · 01/04/2013 15:46

Totally agree Justin. I cannot stand to think of my mums final hours and how poorly she was treated. It is groaning under the strain. Why not charge people for missed appointments for starters. Wht not charge the people who are using it from overseas. It literally cannot go on in its present form. You can't just keep chucking good money after bad.

Report
Darkesteyes · 01/04/2013 16:52

the Labour Party died when John Smith did.

Report
nametakenagain · 01/04/2013 16:57
Report
SirChenjin · 01/04/2013 16:59

Agree Justin.

I'm in Scotland with our devolved NHS (I'm presuming the NHS is talking about the NHS in England rather than the UK...) and I also have the dubious pleasure of working for this creaking, money-haemorrhaging organisation.

Whilst I believe passionately in the NHS and free medical care, there are so many things wrong with the way it operates at the moment - and that's in a country with a left-leaning Parliament.

Report
flatpackhamster · 01/04/2013 17:01

YellowandGreenandRedandBlue

Auntie Stella, the NHS changes are ideological.

Isn't maintaining the NHS in its current form 'ideological'? You have an ideology which says the NHS should be like this, not that. That's an ideology.

I think that 'ideological' is the latest crappy buzzword from the Left which means 'something I don't like' - like 'bigot'.

Argue for them if you wish but don't wring hands and say it had to be done, it didn't, it was a conscious choice by the government of today.

Something had to be done. The NHS is a mess.

Report
flatpackhamster · 01/04/2013 17:03

^AuntieStella*

But there are three AstroTurf titled threads active just on MN this morning; containing some information which is downright wrong. And all tending to assign 'blame' to "nasties" without looking at who sold the principle in the first place; and of course who broke the finances so that public services became unaffordable.

Agree completely. There is a concerted campaign of misinformation from extremist left-wing groups.

Report
VivaLeBeaver · 01/04/2013 17:05

I just hope when Labour get into power at the next election they can somehow reverse this......I'm worried they won't do though.

I've seen a little bit of privatisation in our hospital already. The sterilising service for instruments has been privatised and its chaos. There's never enough instruments/kits. You ring up and say where the hell are some xyz and they just shrug, tell us we have everything back in the system. You tell them that stuff must have gone AWOL then as there isn't anywhere near enough. It's always our fault, not there's. plus every kit we send back we have to remember to include the bar coded tag.....if we don't then our ward is charged £7. So nice little earner for them, costing the Nhs money and then they just seem to loose the equipment. We're having emergencies in theatre/on the ward that we don't have the equipment to deal with.

Report
Sunnywithshowers · 01/04/2013 17:05

flatpackhamster, which threads are they?

Report
CouthySaysEatChoccyEggs · 01/04/2013 17:09

They aren't hiding it here - our Health visiting service has been privatised, and shows the new logo on their letterheads. Service has gone downhill too.

Report
flatpackhamster · 01/04/2013 17:27

Sunnywithshowers

flatpackhamster, which threads are they?

Oh, every day in AIBU there's someone saying "AIBU to think George Osborne should resign" or "AIBU to want Jeremy Hunt to die in a ditch" or "AIBU to think all Tories are evil". It's not AIBU, it's a political post that belongs in the politics part of MN.

And we also have 'people' like Ttosca given free reign to use the most abusive language about people with a different political opinion to here, here on the politics thread.

Report
Solopower1 · 02/04/2013 13:25

Who cares who dunnit? None of us protested enough. People believed Cameron when he said he wouldn't attack the NHS. Now we have to live with it. Sad

But there are some lucky winners! Some unscrupulous doctors will be making megabucks as they give out the tenders to companies owned by their spouses. Insurance companies stand by - we'll all be required to buy health insurance within the next 5 - 10 years, as we'll be refused health care if we can't pay for it. And global health care providers: bonanza day for you! Come to the UK - the market's wide open!

Who are the losers? We are. Plus the doctors and nurses who will continue to get criticised for not being able to do their jobs as the private companies cut costs by reducing staff levels and training opportunities. This is happening already, of course. The media have been complicit in reporting every single NHS horror story so that we won't mind losing it so much.

People who think that competition raises standards only have to look at the train services. Or the dozens of phone companies and gas and electricity providers. More 'choice' doesn't mean higher standards because the providers get together to fix prices and they are very clever at protecting their own interests.

Report
SirChenjin · 02/04/2013 13:51

So - what would you all suggest the Govt (or any future Govt) does with the NHS, and how would you fund it? I'm talking UK wide here, not just England.

Report
JustinBsMum · 02/04/2013 14:16

The more bleating there is, with no suggestion as to how the NHS can be successfully funded, the more i think that our welfare and benefits system has been the downfall of this country. The general population just demand more and more with no desire to give more.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Solopower1 · 02/04/2013 19:33

I think the NHS should be funded through taxation. There's nothing I'd rather pay my taxes for - health and education.

But the NHS will need even more money as the population grows and ages of course, so maybe some part of people's pensions could go towards paying for their care as they get older - the wealthier paying more, of course. I mean as a sort of tax that you pay as you save for your pension, that only goes to the NHS, so that it is still free for everyone at the point of delivery.

The govt is surrounded by 'experts'. Yet no-one can solve this problem of who should fund the NHS? Where there's a will ...

Report
SirChenjin · 02/04/2013 20:45

The truth is the people who often require the most care from the NHS are the people who can't afford it. I work for the NHS in one of the poorest regions in Scotland. There is no point in applying an NHS tax to many of the people I see simply because they either don't work or they are on very low incomes - and yet they cost the Board far more than we would ever recoup from them through an NHS tax.

We can't carry on as we are though, it is simply not sustainable. If we want the service to continue as free at the point of care then we will all have to pay more, but I would also look at some form of Govt insurance to supplement that.

Report
RapunzelAteMyHamster · 02/04/2013 20:47

I've had direct experience of one of the Circle Health Centres. I've had surgical follow ups and x-rays, physio, colposcopies and various procedures to do with that and all my bloods and stuff done there.

It is bloody wonderful. It's clean, calm, comfortable waiting areas, runs pretty much on time (unless you need to see a consultant but they run on their own time wherever you are). Reception, nurses and staff are all polite, competent and kind. It's a private company, running NHS services.

I've also had to use various services at the main hospital, many similar. Takes all day, every time, the people who work there are (charitably) too busy and stressed to get involved with patients or even be polite and it's flaking and old.

If that's the model, bring it on I say.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.