@bigmamapeach
The page that is linked to for the "research" says there is a dataset with 30,000 mothers, but where is the published scientific paper with the results?
madeatuni.org.uk/swansea-university/tackling-uks-low-breastfeeding-rate
"Amy worked with more than 30,000 mothers, collecting data on what normal baby behaviour looks like and the damage strict baby care routines can have, both for breastfeeding and maternal wellbeing. "
I'm wondering how we know that eg, feeding up to 26 times per day is normal;
"Some babies in my research are feeding up to 26 times a day or more."
Remember there are two people in the equation, the mum and the baby (well actually may be other family members affected too, like Mum's partner if there is one), but the mum and baby are most important.
For a lot of things to do with behaviour, it may seem "normal" for one person but not "normal" for the other. How the mum is coping is important too.
Can the researcher clarify how it is checked that frequent feeding at the upper end of the range is in fact normal - that there is not, for example an undiagnosed problem in the baby (like failure to thrive, poor weight gain, medical problems that are causing them not to feed well) or that the very frequent feeding is having a negative impact on Mum?
I'm sure there is loads and loads of variability but would think it's really important not to just tell mums: "well what baby is doing is normal" (however it is exhausting the mother). And you absolutely don't want to let possible maternal concern around a feeding problem pass without investigation.
So having some specific limits on this and being able to see the data and how the families were characterised and evaluated in the study would be useful. Thanks
Ok so cross wires here slightly. The MadeAtUni link is a clip to us talking about all my research over the last 14 years (so that's the 30,000). On the back of it Mumsnet asked me to write a guest piece on feeding frequency and cluster feeding. But there is only limited room in a post
.
So to try and answer your points
- The 26 weeks quote is part of some research I am writing up at the moment. I did the project because I kept coming across the 'your baby will feed 8 - 12 times' thing and thought that didn't fit with a lot of women I talked to and I didnt know where that info came from.
Looking at the literature I'm still not sure. Just like much of this general area there is a lack of published evidence. There is one study published in Australia that suggests most babies feed between 8 - 14 times in 24 hours with a reported range in their study of 6 - 18 (but thats not 8 - 12 times)
Kent, J. C., Mitoulas, L. R., Cregan, M. D., Ramsay, D. T., Doherty, D. A., & Hartmann, P. E. (2006). Volume and frequency of breastfeedings and fat content of breast milk throughout the day.Pediatrics,117(3), e387-e395.
There's not much more from 'Western' countries. If you look at cultures where mum and baby are close all day, baby is carried in a sling etc, and there are no expectations on limiting feeds then babies feed much more. Two studies in Bangladesh observed how many feeds over an 8 hour period and they both found babies were feeding every hour or so in that period (but they didn't measure at night)
Ghosh, R., Mascie‐Taylor, C. N., & Rosetta, L. (2006). Longitudinal study of the frequency and duration of breastfeeding in rural Bangladeshi women.American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Association,18(5), 630-638.
Zeitlin, M. F., & Ahmed, N. U. (1995). Nutritional correlates of frequency and length of breastfeeds in rural Bangladesh.Early Human Development,41(2), 97-110.
Then there is the famous anthropological study of a very remote tribe - they found the average frequency of feeds was 4 times an hour and the longest break they witnessed was 55 minutes. Feeds were just a few minutes long though from within the sling.
Konner M. Nursing frequency and birth spacing in] Kung hunter-gatherers. IPPF medical bulletin. 1978 Apr 1;15(2):1-3.
But that only tells us what is biologically 'normal' in cultures that are vey different to ours. So the research I hope to publish soon takes a snapshot of feeding frequency from a large group of women (18,000) and I've plotted the average number of feeds per 24 hours for various ages. It's showing that there is a wide variety of normal and the average frequency of feeds per day goes up and down over time (in line with what we kind of knew about growth spurts anyway).
The variation in feeds is large, ranging from 6 - 26 feeds a day. It's important to point out that all women just recorded one day, so we don't know from this if those babies were always feeding that much (although 96% of women said their baby shows variation in frequency of feeds from week to week). I would like to do more detailed research looking at what's happening in those high frequency babies.
It's also really difficult to actually define a feed in babies who feed very frequently. Although we had instructions about how to count a feed (e.g. a clear break) some people might count several feeds as one, whist others might say it was more.
Once we've published I'll come back and link it here 
As for your point out maternal wellbeing. That's another question and an important one that needs further research and understanding as it is a major issue. Back when I did my Phd I looked at why women didn't want to responsively feed. It being overwhelming, anxiety provoking, impacting on the other things they needed to do were all reasons. And again it's got to be about balance for that family.
However I would like to see a system where more investment in women and families (better paid, longer leave, cheaper childcare for older children if that's what is wanted and more support and care in general) meant that it wasn't quite so hard.