My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Guest posts

When a child has additional needs, why do we assume that the mother will be the carer?

37 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 07/02/2014 14:54

Those of us who are carers, or have perhaps seen our parents care for their parents, have an understanding of the relentless struggle it brings. The physical, behavioural and emotional needs of the loved one we care for are often enormous.

It seems even more daunting and - let's be honest - unfair, when that brutal caring responsibility begins with, or shortly after, the start of motherhood. In other words, caring for your own child. Of course we all care for our children, but I mean care with a capital ‘C’. The naïve idyll you imagined with the tiny life you brought into the world disappears; your hopes, dreams and expectations for a delightful childhood, tempestuous adolescence and, within a couple of decades, a ceremonial flight into the world of independent adulthood, literally crashes around your ears.

It's a physical experience when your world caves-in. You actually feel your whole being jolt, go cold and spin. Your future flashes before your eyes and screams off into the distance – the future you know deep, deep inside, you will never have.

Gradually, as a mother of a child with additional needs or disabilities, you accept your child's difficulties, and willingly make the necessary sacrifices. Motherhood brings strengths and reserves many of us had no idea we were capable of.

But why mothers? Are fathers not equally capable of unconditional love for a child? Of course they are. Is the internal growl of a mother stronger in terms of protecting her defenceless, needy new-born? And because those needs continue due to disability, does the powerful caring bond intensify? Perhaps it's the societal pressure for men to be the breadwinner and work full-time? Or is it simply more acceptable for mothers to be ‘Carers’?

When a child has a disability, research shows that mothers reduce workplace commitments, while fathers tend to withdraw from family to invest more in their jobs. If mothers give up work, families rely on one salary and the wage-earning partner tends to work long hours, which further polarises childcare responsibilities.

As Professor Traustadottir, of the University of Iceland observes: “There is a pervading sense that the impact of disability is minimal if it only limits the mother.” Somehow it seems okay to put unbearable strain on mothers, impact on their health, well-being and careers, expect them to be self-sacrificing, downtrodden, and exhausted - and to be happy about it. If you call out for help there is very little there - respite is patchy and infrequent. If you admit you are struggling or feeling depressed, the spectre of social services looms. Am I being over dramatic? Perhaps. I haven't experienced all of this - but I know of mothers who have.

There is something disingenuous about the very term: ‘carer’. When we talk about ‘working mums’ or ‘stay at home mums’, we acknowledge the role of the woman. But when a child has additional needs, government, professionals, society and even mothers themselves use gender-neutral terms, which obscure women's primary role in care giving - and the high costs they bear.

I have certainly lost my own identity in all this - there is a sense that I am carer first, then mother, then me. I admit it - I am confused about where carer stops and mother begins. I am even more at a loss to find my own self in all this – she was lost years ago and stayed that way for some time. Only now am I beginning to have dreams and aspirations of my own again. I feel guilty about it - real, mind-bending, conflicted guilt. All the time. Am I letting my children down, my marriage down and now my business down? But, finally after seven years, I have found that I must do something that is ‘me’.

‘Me’. Ouch, there's the guilt creeping in again. It's not easy or straightforward – it's like walking a tightrope every day. It feels scary and out-of-control - but it's also enormously liberating and makes me feel alive to the tips of my toes.

I know, though, that I have been one of the 'lucky ones'. I've been able to regain a sense of self through setting up Rosy & Bo - but it has only been possible for me with the help of family and my co-founders. There are many, many women with children with additional needs who cannot imagine being able to find the time, the energy, the financial wherewithal to do what I've done. Somehow, we must find a way to support them, to recognise their strength, their determination and resilience and the attributes they bring to work - and help them to build an identity beyond that of carer.

OP posts:
Report
Honeysweet · 08/02/2014 11:45

I too that that the ad was completely unnecessary. Sometimes mumsnet ask guest bloggers to come on, so that might have been a condition that the guest blogger agreed to come on?

Report
pollycomelightly · 08/02/2014 15:24

I had my DD as a single parent and ex has never been involved, so the question of who would be the primary carer has always been obvious. I attend a lot of local/national carer/SEN events and there are very few dads present. I find these events really useful for feeling less alone and finding others to discuss similar problems, I imagine it would be hard to be the only/one of the few male carers there.

I have never worked since I had DD, as I was a sahm as a single parent anyway when she was diagnosed (at age 4 with autism/ADHD). So I didn't really experience a loss of salary or identity through work. Being a sahm/carer suits me much better than dealing with the complications of juggling work and caring, and I was relieved when DD got her diagnosis as it allowed us to claim DLA/Carers Allowance, otherwise I would have been expected to claim JSA and meet demands for signing on/workfare.

I manage to keep my sense of self through doing activities during school hours, which I see as my respite time (we get no other respite through social services; some was offered but unsuitable due to the carers/activities offered). I have hobbies, do sports, meet up with friends and go out, as well as catching up with all the errands and housework that I can't manage while I'm watching dd at home. I wouldn't really want to find a job during school hours as I'd lose the time I have for my own interests, and it would have to be quite a low-paid (and probably uninteresting) job to keep my earnings below the Carers Allowance threshold. I need to be at home to meet her taxi from school, so working outside of school hours wouldn't work, and I've never found a carer who would understand her needs fully.

I think I've found it easier to adjust to being a parent carer than many others I know, because I wasn't in a high earning/status profession to begin with, and also there was some element of choice in leaving my ex. I don't want him involved with dd for various reasons, so I don't feel any anger at him for abandoning us in any way, in fact I think our lives are much easier without his input.

Report
BuildUpMyFence · 08/02/2014 16:55

I got left as did my children by their Dad when the children were diagnosed, I think some Men just can't cope with bad health.

I had no choice other than to become a carer, there was nobody else around we were abandoned emotionally, physically and financially.

Report
zebrafinch · 08/02/2014 20:08

"Why do we assume that it is the mothers who will be the Carers?"

because many fathers of disabled children cannot cope and exit the family as soon as they can justify this action to themselves??

Any academic studies on why fathers abandon their families, how they justify this and do the fathers suffer any lasting psychological, emotional, financial and social impact as a consequence ???

Report
ancientbuchanan · 09/02/2014 10:42

Because statistically that is how it has been, just as in most cases post divorce children live with their mothers. Not all, but in most cases. And because the research suggests that while abandonment by either parent is bad, abandonment by a mother is far worse, indicating a particular maternal bond hence an assumption of maternal care.

I am not saying that this is necessarily right nor that men should not do more in many or most cases.

in fact, I'd like to pay tribute to DH here..It was he who rushed home and looked after Ds, sat for days with him on his lap, didn't pursue his career. Ok he was the lesser earner, but even so. He didn't always get the meds right, which was scary. I had to do the non standard appointments. But he still did far more than I ever thought likely.

Black lab, there is a heart wrenching book by Stephen Venables which describes what you are going through, though I am not sure how much directed violence they had to suffer. Friends of ours too are in this position, but have found an equilibrium now. The guilt bubbles away, but actually, for the longer term, it is an investment worth making.

Report
ancientbuchanan · 09/02/2014 10:44

Nor am I suggesting that abandonment occurs, but that there is a particular maternal dependency.

Report
FanFuckingTastic · 09/02/2014 12:58

I couldn't care for my DD with behavioural problems because of my own disability, although that was what was expected of me by children's social services.

I contact adult social services about my situation and managed to get 27 hours of care put in place for myself, to support with my caring for the children. I think about 8 hours of it was specified for care pertaining to the children. It was that or give up my children to their fathers, which did eventually happen. Now her father is her carer.

Report
Herecomesthesciencebint · 09/02/2014 20:24

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TamerB · 09/02/2014 22:16

I assume it because it is generally what happens. If I had a child with SN I would want to be the one doing the caring.

Report
BlackLabrador · 09/02/2014 23:26

Thank you HereComes and everyone who has been so nice on this thread.. I feel I actually went off on a bit of a tangent in my first post Blush but it all just sort of came out..

Report
Lemele · 10/02/2014 12:39

My husband has an autistic son from his previous marriage. From what I can tell from his reports of that time, he was competent as a father simply because his wife didn't do the things he thought necessary, like putting the kids to bed instead of letting them fall asleep on the sofa, etc. (But only things that were getting in the way of 'easy living' as far as I can tell!)

However, once married to me he obviously realised that if he left it all to me I would do everything... typical motherly response I guess? It's definitely laziness on his part. Now that we have 3 young kids (two being twins) and after a lot of prodding he is a bit more pro-active with the children but still does as little as he sees necessary.

What's sadder is that his SN son hardly sees him - maybe because he's not a necessary part of his care any more (he used to stay with us every other weekend but that became impossible with our young children vs a very large and rather aggressive sn child, then he was moved to residential care), and definitely because there are other people to work around (re the people at his residential care). Whenever I challenge DH about it or suggest he fixes a twice- or even just once-a-month date to visit in order that it won't get forgotten, he just says, "yes, i know" but never actually does anything.

Priorities and laziness. Hmm

Report
colditz · 10/02/2014 16:17

Wow, lemele, your husband is a shit, I'm glad he's not my ex!

Leaving a large and greasiness child with his mother 24/7 because you've had more children than you can cope with? That's awful, absolutely awful. Like the poor child has been replaced with upgraded models

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.