I haven't read every post, but looking at some, I'd say a few of the anti- Govites are making rather feeble arguments at times.
- It is patronising to dismiss the 'Daily Mail' crowd- they represent a large proportion of decent middle England, so why dismiss their views any more than , say, Guardian readers?
- Children are burnt out at the end of term- hmm. Are they? Really? So why do most parents complain that school holidays are too long? Far more parents say this than parents clamouring for shorter school days or terms.
- 'Exams are getting harder, children will have lower grades, employers will be confused.' ( to paraphrase something said by Noblegiraffe.) To counteract this, what about employers knowing that in 2014, the exam system changed, just the same as over the last 20 years exam grades have become inflated- leaving employers perhaps much more confused as to the value of those grades.
Many independent school have scrapped GCSEs anyway due to their limited value.
I began teaching in the 1970s. I retired not long ago, having taught in both private and state schools. On the whole, I feel that Gove is doing quite a lot of stuff that makes sense. I have despaired at how subjects have been dumbed down over the last 35 years- especially my own subject- English- so much that I was glad to leave the profession which bore no resemblance to when I entered it in terms of intellectual vigour. The 'rot' IMO began in the early 80s when the GCSE was introduced, and an academic curriculum was watered down so every student could take the exam, and no one could 'fail'. Then we have coursework which students could re-hash until it met an expected grade, then we had texts which were allowed into the exam room- annotated!.
The entire marking scheme has changed with less emphasis on grammar and spelling, and the texts studied have become easier- and in addition students rarely study an entire serious , lengthy novel.
Anything which turns back the clock and reinstates some intellectual challenges is IMO for the better.