Working from home might be sustainable if we had a society in which working people had good access to secure and affordable homes
The housing angle is an interesting and complex one, sure, but I'm not sure secure and affordable is much of an issue. The vast majority of the presently wfh population got chucked into this with little notice.
What becomes interesting is:
- commercial lets tanking - would some be converted back into domestic use?
- location inflation - if I'm not in the office, why would I need to live within an hour? I can meet virtually, attend training courses local to me, and commute occasionally for F2F. Competition could dramatically increase the cost of rural locations previously unsuited to workers.
- provision of services to domestic residential areas - with more of the population staying near where they live, is there an increased demand
- type of housing - I'd have picked a different house if I'd known my husband and I were both going to be living and working in it five days a week.
- cost of general transport - with lower commute footfall, will costs increase?
- cost of services - are they cheaper because of lower office costs? Or the same because staff need to be paid enough to afford a home with working space?
- childcare - you can't wfh with toddlers around you all day, and it would be a bugger to replace the commute with a drop off to a distant nursery etc