@LadyPenelope68 I have followed the actual data very closely (as opposed to what I consider grossly irresponsible media spin) and in my eyes the risk to children of serious complications from corona is vanishingly small, so as to be negligible. My son’s school is staffed almost entirely by fit and young teachers. I have great faith in the abilities of the staff and indeed other families at the school to conduct their own risk assessments, and decide whether they will continue to work and/or send their children into school or not. The government supports this, they have already stated that families will not be fined for not sending children.
I and every other parent at the school have chosen to build a life for our families in a city centre where generally speaking pollution levels are high, which has a negative effect on health. However, we all feel that the moderate disadvantages of this are greatly exceeded by the benefits of living here. There is risk in everything.
DS’s school is doing a fantastic job of the educational side of things (though actual school would be better). Other schools are not. Having served as a school governor for many years, I genuinely believe that for most children, school is the best place to be, ONCE the numbers are right.
I will say that the vast majority of families at our school have two working parents, so for our children it isn’t a question of doing instagram worthy crafts etc and spending quality time as a family instead of risking The Virus. It is setting the kids up for learning and then giving them the bare minimum input throughout the day, as everyone has work fo do. The children would be much better off in school with their friends. It would also be significantly better for the mental health of my family to be around other people at this point.
My bottom line is that people should be able to choose for themselves, but that we simply have to get the country moving.