The SNP are governing Scotland a damn sight better than the Conservatives are ‘governing’ the UK.
Scotland will balance the books the same or better than any other small country. Are you suggesting Scotland doesn’t have the resources? “These estimates for GNI confirm that Scotland is a wealthy and prosperous country” – Fraser of Allander Institute.
An independent Scotland will have a GDP the size of Portugal and a population the size of Lithuania, I’m pretty sure we will be fine. If not, tell me why not please? In comparison to other independent countries, what will stop us from being successful and thriving? With a generous amount of the resources that any nation would need to prosper, why is Scotland not fitted to be independent?
There were 51 independent members who signed up for the United Nations in 1945, there are now 193 independent members of the UN. Not one of the broke a sweat over what currency they would adopt. As they negotiated their independence they decided what would be the most useful currency option to adopt. This is what Scotland will do. And no matter what currency option is adopted, it will be shouted down and rubbished by Unionists. No matter how sensible or otherwise. In 2014 the Unionist response on our chosen currency option was a lie. They said we could not use the pound, when afterwards it was admitted that we could have used the pound and the banks were in fact preparing for that option. So I’m not going to argue about currency when no matter what is said, it will be rubbished. Basically, an independent Scotland will chose whatever currency option is best for an independent Scotland.
If Scotland’s economy is weak, we need to grow it. Continuing in the Union is asking for more of the same, and worse.
Scotland’s current deficit is the result of Scotland being trapped in a UK economy with a £1,85 trillion national debt. Scotland is being charged more than £4 billion every year in interest on the UK’s debt. Also more than £3 billion for ‘defence’ (where is our defence? We are the only maritime nation without a navy). Denmark and Finland and New Zealand defend themselves on less than half of that. We also pay a share of the expenses of the London underground system, the London sewerage network and lots of other areas of “national expenditure” that have nothing to do with us. And the House of Lords.
If we are short of NHS consultants, we’re not as short as the NHS in the rest of the UK. And being allowed to deal with our own immigration policies would be a very good place to start instead of complaining when the Scottish Government’s hands are tied.
The UK and the Scottish Government agreed that pensions will be fully honoured. It really is about the worst pension in Europe. A Scottish Government will aim to match the Irish pension as a first step.
Lesley Riddoch says "The debate about our constitutional future invariably portrays Scotland as a small, remote nation, stubbornly demanding its own perspectives on just about every issue, instead of accepting the UK norm. "Actually, from a Northern point of view, Scotland is a relatively big country, facing nothing like the remoteness of northern Norway, Finland or Iceland. "Yet countries like these consistently out-perform Scotland. "But since no media seeks out these northern neighbours, Scots are none the wiser about what is normal for small nations all around us."
You should watch her short films about various small nations to see what Scotland could achieve, instead of talking Scotland down.