My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

Or is sport considered part of your social life?

45 replies

dogscatsandbabies · 24/08/2014 18:59

DP plays hockey. Pre season training has started on Saturdays. When the season gets going at least 3 out of 4 Saturdays will be match day. Home games mean she's out of the house 2 and a half hours, away matches between 3 and 6 hours depending on travel. Training runs one evening a week, about 2 hours a pop.

So I'm left with 2 children (3 and 4 months) while she goes off on a social every weekend. However she says that hockey is not at all like socialising with friends and will not accept that this is comparable to a very busy social life. I used to play a decent bit of volleyball and despite the fact it was sometimes hard work, training and matches were always good craic.

So, the question is- how do you classify playing sport. Social life or other category?

OP posts:
Report
thenightsky · 24/08/2014 19:47

On the weekend she doesn't do hockey, why not book yourself a spa weekend? Wink

Report
Lweji · 24/08/2014 19:48

I'd say sport is more like a hobby.
Unless she went for drinks after. You are usually with people but don't get to know them very well.
It's also good for your health. Often mental health as well as physical.

Unless it's not at all possible, it might be a good idea to include the family more with this, such as watching the games and travelling to and fro. And I don't see how you can't have about an hour or two per week for yourself alone, with no family or kids in tow.

Work can be quite social too, or more, sometimes, but I wouldn't call it a social activity.

Report
sanfairyanne · 24/08/2014 19:50

just 'me time'
tbh with kids that young, neither of us had a lot of 'me time'
can you get childcare a couple of hours a week and use that as downtime?

Report
mandy214 · 24/08/2014 19:50

Yes half a day for each partner doesnt sound like alot but presumably there are other constraints on your time - chores, homework, children's activities, shopping - if you literally have nothing else going on then its do-able but I dont think many families operate like that (certainly as children get older and have sporting commitments themselves, swimming lessons etc etc)

Report
raspberryslush · 24/08/2014 19:54

Yes, I would classify playing a sport in a team as social.

As you have two young children, whether it is sport/ another hobby or meeting friends, it is time away from the family meaning that your partner needs to look after the children alone.

IMO you should both be able to take roughly equal 'time off'. If she chooses to spend it playing sport and you choose to go to the pub with mates, that's fair enough. Obviously, it shouldn't be rigid but, it should be equitable overall.

Report
chinamoon · 24/08/2014 19:55

I agree it's v good for your DC to see fitness as normal in life, and for your DP to be fit. Long term that's a massive benefit. But the imbalance really doesn't work. You don't have to tot up the exact same amount of hours on something of your own but I do think you should aim to exercise for at least 3-7 hours a week, and that your DP should make allowances for this, plus maybe an evening a week where you do a hobby.

To have family time, just make sure that two times a week are set in stone. Maybe Sunday all day should be a day for outings or snuggling up at home as a family, or visiting friends together. And you could do the same with, say, Friday nights. When DC were little we'd do film night. Cheesy family movie, home made pizzas. eaten in the dark in front of the film.

You have the whole of the non hockey season to make up time for yourself to pursue a hobby and for her to pull her weight as a mother, and for family time. Why not take the DC along to some of her matches? As long as everyone in the family is looking out for each other, it doesn't matter if there are patches of imbalance. That's inevitable.

Report
DocDaneeka · 24/08/2014 21:17

Agree with others.

Don't get hung up on the 'sport or social' aspect. It's all me time.

Me time is vital, but it should be equal. I have 2 sports that could be, and pre kids were massively time consuming, all week type things. I gave up one and dialled the other right back once I had a baby. Only now dc are school age have I taken up something similar again, and only on the understanding with dh that I don't get obsessed with competing again.

He gets similar time to himself, he goes out on his motorbike with that time.

Report
dogscatsandbabies · 24/08/2014 21:31

Thanks for all responses. I'm really not cross about how much hockey she plays, just incredulous that she thinks it doesn't count in the 'this is how I enjoy myself' section of life. She does enjoy it btw!

Lots of good suggestions re: taking time for me. I'm a simpleton really and enjoy nothing more than blackberry picking at the country park with DP, kids and dog. When not on mat leave I work FT and I consider that to be enough time away from DC. The odd night out is lovely but actually I don't want more time for 'me'. The difficulties of two FT working parents puts constraints on the time we have for 'us' and hockey doesn't help but it's not insurmountable.

Also, whilst it is a lovely idea to go and watch as a family, and we do this as much as the weather allows, outdoor winter sports are for people hardier than I.

OP posts:
Report
Happy36 · 24/08/2014 22:48

Team sport is part of a social life, as is running, going to the gym etc. with friends.

Exercising alone is personal time.

It´s important to exercise but some types of exercise can be done as a family, e.g. cycling, running (with older children), playing many different games such as racket sports, basketball, football, softball, beach cricket, so parents don´t necessarily need personal or social time away from the family to stay fit.

Report
Lweji · 25/08/2014 11:55

I can understand that for you being with people is important, particularly your family, and you may not need "me time".
But some people do. They do need to be on their own. Presumably your partner doesn't see it as socializing because it's not about that for her. She may go in and out without really dealing with the people, as such.

I think it's important to recognise that as well.
For me it could be to be alone and read a book, go for a walk, shopping, or watch some TV quietly.
For her it may be her sport.

Other people may need company to relax. As you seem to.

We are not all the same and that's fine.

Report
fredfredgeorgejnr · 25/08/2014 12:39

If you're giving up your "me time" to have "family time", then that's your choice, and I don't think you can complain. It doesn't matter what you call it, it's not unreasonable to have the time away, and she's happy for you to have the same.

You shouldn't ask her to be grateful, simply because you choose to spend your me time in a different way to hers, neither of your choices are wrong and you can't resent someone for assuming your different choice is a sacrifice.

Report
5Foot5 · 25/08/2014 13:11

I'm really not cross about how much hockey she plays, just incredulous that she thinks it doesn't count in the 'this is how I enjoy myself' section of life. She does enjoy it btw!

I am incredulous too! Especially if she then expects to get more "me time" on top of the time she already spends on hockey. That would be really unreasonable.

Report
ForalltheSaints · 25/08/2014 15:23

In a country with the obesity problems we have anyone playing sport should be encouraged wherever possible and practical.

Report
Nomama · 25/08/2014 15:29

She may just be being a bit defensive. It depends on how you have discussed it. If you have made her feel as though she needs to justify herself or you are feeling martyred then she isn't going to be particularly coherent in response.

Not saying you have set out to do that, but that may be what she heard. We all know how easy it is to hear things that aren't quite what the speaker/poster intended!

Report
Happy36 · 25/08/2014 17:16

Agree with 5Foot5.

Report
Claybury · 25/08/2014 17:32

Some may not agree but I think that's a lot of time away from family with kids so young. Yes it is 'social ' in that it's something she chooses to do. Yes it's good for her to get that much of a break. Do you mind ? It is tough for you when she's out? Or perhaps you enjoy having the kids to yourself? That's what is comes down to, it's not for others to judge.
My youngest is 9 and I still don't spend that much time doing sport at the weekend much as I would love to. In a few years it will be easier for me.

Report
whois · 25/08/2014 19:54

Sport = 'me time' as far as I'm concerned.

If I've been out for a run on my own, aged a game of netball or had dinner with my friends I see that as similar in terms of it being non work non home and all about me.

Report
whois · 25/08/2014 19:55

just incredulous that she thinks it doesn't count in the 'this is how I enjoy myself' section of life

It's defo in the 'enjoy myself' section of life! Otherwise why do it?

Report
Lepaskilf · 25/08/2014 20:26

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

DeWee · 25/08/2014 22:16

I think it's a very difficult one. Because you can't say "play hockey matches one evening instead" or "could you just go for an hour" or probably even "could you just play every other match, or "don't go to training" because there aren't hockey matches in the evening, you can't just go for one hour, playing every other match may lose the place in the team (and if it doesn't she may feel she's letting the team down) and not going to training with almost certainly lose the place in the team.
In that way it isn't the same as going to the gym, or swimming or something you can choose how much and when.

I used to play tennis at an okay standard. I played 5-6 days a week typically. I've just taken it up after again 15 years. I'm aiming to get out to one of the club nights once a week. However part of me would like to go to every one (4 a week). I've also been asked to do matches. At present I go when I can to the club nights (which may be 3 one week, none the next) and am reserve for the matches as I've said I can't commit permanently.
But for tennis, I can go down, have one set taking about 45 minutes, and then say I have to get back and go home. I also can play occasional matches without committing every week. I hope to also arrange a couple of games during the week-you only need one other for tennis rather than however many is a hocket team (plus opponents)
It is enjoyment, and I know that. However at the same time I did have to say to dh after the first 6 weeks of being a member and he kept forgetting or not being able to get home in time for me to do club nights, that there was no point me joining and going once a month, it isn't worth it either for money or for my enjoyment as I have to spend the first hour getting used to which way up to hold the racket again. Wink

Now to me, dh has done a lot of volunteering for committee type things (think school governors type things) while the children have been little. And those have had to take priority over things I wanted to do. I could guarantee any "mums' night out" would clash with a meeting he couldn't miss-or if it didn't, he'd have 6 meetings that month and couldn't spare the overtime to get out of work early. And dh knows that because of his commitments I have been home with 3 dc to get to bed on my own because of things he is doing. Now they aren't necessarily things he would choose to do with spare time, but he did choose to do them.
If he has a meeting then it will still generally take priority over tennis, but he has fewer in the evenings now, and I can go other nights.

So over time it probably will roughly even out in time I suppose.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.