My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

to want pics of my baby off a third party business page

191 replies

LadyGranulomaFortesque · 10/05/2013 13:35

We attended a 1st birthday party last year and unbeknownst to me, one of the people there was in the process of setting up a photography business. I had no idea she was even taking pictures but a friend has just messaged me to say there are a few pics of my then six month old baby being used as promotion on her business Facebook page.

I am fuming - she didn't even ask even though she is a friend of a friend. I keep all of my pictures private and apart from a little cameo of me and my son together in my profile pic, there are NO pictures of him on Facebook and even pics of me are mostly private (I am weird like that).

I realise she took the pictures (covertly as today is the first time i have seen them) and I have sent her a polite message to take them down. Anyone have any idea where I stand legally if she refuses. I am so not happy about my little man being used as advertising for someone else's business. I feel like our privacy has been violated when I am normally so careful.

OP posts:
Report
IneedAsockamnesty · 15/05/2013 20:40

Don't say anything at all about her grammar it will make you look like a knob and invalidate genuine concerns.

Report
differentnameforthis · 15/05/2013 09:57

The photo's have been removed

Make sure you tell her that there is no apostrophe in photos & that as a consumer, this would put me right off using her services.

Report
GingerBlondecat · 15/05/2013 09:38

? Davey? Are YOU the photographer?

what an odd responce to this. Have you read the whole thread ?

If you have then here have a Biscuit

Report
maddening · 14/05/2013 22:34

But Davey - she didn't ask permission and was then rude when she was asked very reasonably to remove the pics which is the op's legal right to do so. 

Report
MoonlightandRoses · 14/05/2013 22:21

Yes, I remember those days, heaving my bulk wandering gaily along having a hot flush 'glowing', wearing a 'floaty' outfit...Not sure how, given that lot, but the due date really did arrive before I knew it.

So, two weeks to the bank holiday, then two weeks after that it's four weeks before and then...Grin

Report
daveydavidson · 14/05/2013 22:01

Wouldn't of bothered me at all if she asked permission. YAB a bit U and precious

Report
MrsSpagBol · 14/05/2013 21:58

I hope so!!! I am so tired of being pregnant!

Report
MoonlightandRoses · 14/05/2013 21:48

Ah, but this is a virtual one, so you're fine. Grin

The nine weeks will fly in.

Report
MrsSpagBol · 14/05/2013 20:42

Oh Moonlight I wish I could imbibe Wine - 9 weeks to go! Smile

Report
MoonlightandRoses · 14/05/2013 20:29

MrsSB. Ditto and Wine? Smile

Report
Purplehonesty · 14/05/2013 19:22

Ooh this would have annoyed me too. When we got married a young videographer who was just starting up did our video. We didn't pay very much and there was no contract etc. he did a good job and we were very pleased.
However a few months later someone stopped me in the street and said they recognised me from my wedding video...I asked where they had seen it and they said the guy had been sending out copies of my full wedding DVD to potential clients! I was livid, I've no idea how many people had seen it, watched me cry during my vows and dancing with my dh.
To top it off we went to the cinema one night and our picture came up during the averts at the start, promoting his business!
I had to ask him about ten times to stop, eventually left him a very angry and ranty voicemail threatening legal action which his dad replied to stating our video would not be used again.
Talk about mad!!

Report
JenaiMorris · 14/05/2013 19:07

Indeed.

Rarely but effectively, blowing a gasket is well worth it.

Report
MrsDeVere · 14/05/2013 18:54

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MrsSpagBol · 14/05/2013 18:48

Moonlight fair enough. Here: peace offering? Flowers

Report
StuntGirl · 14/05/2013 16:29

Aw gutted I missed your response to her OP! She sounds like an absolute charlatan, what have your mutual friends said about the whole thing? I'd take a very dim view of one of my friends behaving like this.

Report
MoonlightandRoses · 14/05/2013 15:49

MrsSB - Apologies, that certainly wasn't the intention - I'd simply responded as you'd mentioned my name in your last post - that's all. Hadn't found anything emotive or offensive in them and wasn't belittling your view-point, just re-stating mine.

Report
MrsSpagBol · 14/05/2013 15:25

TBH Moonlight I still don't really understand why you picked on my posts specifically. I did not encourage any specific action in any of my posts (eg trashing her business), I just said I couldn't bear the issue being minimised as it was(in my view - which I believe I am entitled to) :

  1. Common sense
  2. Basic photography "etiquette"
  3. Obvious business practice


That anyone should be expected to know, let alone a professional.

So my views still stand. I was bemused to be honest as to what you found so incredibly emotive and offensive about my specific posts. I didn't actually suggest any specific action in any of my initial posts. Confused
Report
MoonlightandRoses · 14/05/2013 15:10

Goodness, she showed her true colours. Glad the second response was rather more appropriate than the first. It might be worth tie-ing her into a timeline for removal too, which I am guessing she didn't provide in her second email. It is also worth flagging the issue with the ASA and other relevant bodies irrespective of the 'apology' if you feel she still doesn't understand what the problems in acting this way are.

MrsSB - my point still stands. Where there is no immediate risk, and there wasn't, one should not react in the way suggested until there is proof that one should. In this case proof was provided and LadyG acted on it.

Report
LadyGranulomaFortesque · 14/05/2013 14:48

I know re the last line. I do agree but it was important, simply because it demonstrates that this was someone that clearly didn't like us but thought it was ok to take advantage.

OP posts:
Report
treas · 14/05/2013 14:47

I think Op that you will be unlikely to receive an apology from this person as they are covering their arse should you take it further legally, as an apology would be seen as an admission of guilt.

Report
Blatherskite · 14/05/2013 14:45

You diluted your point with that last line.

You should always have MN proof read your ranty emails first Wink

Report
LadyGranulomaFortesque · 14/05/2013 14:40

She has managed to apologise (for her responses, that I am unhappy), without ever apologising for the actual images, the advertisements or the distribution around the net..... so no, the penny clearly hasn't fully dropped.

She has focused more on the very last sentence than any other (touched a nerve?)

Just multiple apologies and an assurance that as soon as she has full access to the net that she will remove everything.

OP posts:
Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

JenaiMorris · 14/05/2013 14:40

Ah, well it sounds like badbride is right about rockets Grin

What has she said?

Report
MrsSpagBol · 14/05/2013 14:34

Please expand on "sounds worried" - has the penny (finally) dropped?

Report
badbride · 14/05/2013 14:33

...QED Grin

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.