Talk

Advanced search

An Instance Of The Fingerpost

(23 Posts)
janeite Tue 01-Sep-09 18:32:52

Anybody read it? Just toiled to the end and wondering why I bothered.

Slubberdegullion Tue 01-Sep-09 18:34:12

I LOVED this book, did read it an age ago mind. The first bit with the doctor and the dried cat's poo in the eye (is this right or my imagination) I thought was all very interesting.

janeite Tue 01-Sep-09 18:35:56

Yes it was interesting and yes, lots of quite compelling stuff in it and obviously very well researched - but it didn't half go round the houses.

janeite Tue 01-Sep-09 18:36:49

It's just my sort of thing as well (or so I thought) but it just kept making me cross and I wanted to shake him and say, 'Just bloomin' get ON with it, why don't you?'

Slubberdegullion Tue 01-Sep-09 18:38:44

grin

I don't remember getting cross with him, whoever it was who wrote it, who was it that wrote it btw?

Now see you've made me want to re-read it again.

janeite Tue 01-Sep-09 18:39:58

Iain Pears

Slubberdegullion Tue 01-Sep-09 18:45:59

Didn't you feel enriched with post civil war history though? I rememeber feeling quite full of proper history afterwards. Now all I can rememeber is the cat poo in the eye, and a woman being hanged, oh and the blood transfusion with a quill or something.

janeite Tue 01-Sep-09 18:49:44

I thought the post-hanging thing (with Lower) was excellent, both times it was described. The medical bits really interested me as I'm quite into medical history anyway.

The civil-war stuff didn't do it much for me because there was so little about it: just vague references to uprisings. And the religious stuff just bored me.

Slubberdegullion Tue 01-Sep-09 18:51:50

Hm I've obviously blnaked out all the boring religious stuff. Isn't Cromwell in it a bit somewhere?

Doodlez Tue 01-Sep-09 18:51:55

This is a finger post:-





............./´¯/)..
............/....//...
.........../....//....
...../´¯/..../´¯\....
.././.../..../..../.|_..
(.(....(....(..../.)..)..
.\................\/.../ ...
..\................. /...
....\..............(...


grin

janeite Tue 01-Sep-09 18:53:30

Very clever!

seeker Tue 01-Sep-09 18:57:48

I loved it. It was recommended by the person I have admired most on Mumsnet, and I was really worried that I wouldn't like it and I would discover that my heroine had feet of clay, but I thought it was so rich and full of 'stuff" and very memorable.

janeite Tue 01-Sep-09 19:00:25

See now Seeker, YOU are one of the ones I admire on Mumsnet - so now I feel guilty for not loving it!

seeker Tue 01-Sep-09 19:39:13

Very honoured - and blush!

janeite Tue 01-Sep-09 22:07:06

Has anybody else read it?

choosyfloosy Tue 01-Sep-09 22:14:37

yup. Liked it. It was a bookclub thing. I really enjoy multiple viewpoint books.

Read like someone's labour of love, but I think Iain Pears (?) has written lots more.

MrsBadger Tue 01-Sep-09 22:19:51

I liek it because it is long

and I always forget trhe vital plot twists

I reread it on holiday every 5y or so

janeite Tue 01-Sep-09 23:02:27

Is it quite an old one then? I had never heard of it but liked the cover in the library!

I liked the first and final narratives but was irritated by Prescott and Wallis and found theirs to be v meandering.

SouthernMeerkat Wed 02-Sep-09 11:33:05

I loved it - I read it ages ago and remember being really struck by the richness of the language - but it's my sort of book. I am currently devouring CJ Sansom's trilogy (currently reading Sovereign) and really enjoying the historical context to the stories.....

janeite Wed 02-Sep-09 15:39:50

CJ Sansom is fab - I have loved them all. They seem more tightly structured than Incidence Of.... and the characters are more compelling.

Botbot Wed 02-Sep-09 15:43:14

I loved it too. It's set in my favourite historical period (did it for A-level History). Having said that, it's been about 10 years since I read it so I can't recall any detail.

Ceasnake Wed 02-Sep-09 22:41:25

I agree that it is hard going at times but I think it's worth the effort. I also love the multiple viewpoints and the many unreliable narrators.

janeite Thu 03-Sep-09 18:59:49

Yes - unreliable narrators are a 'Good Thing' but I prefer them when I like them or at least sympathise somewhat with them!

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now