My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

What we're reading

Wetlands. What do we think?

16 replies

morningpaper · 19/02/2009 21:34

I am up to p 50 and have looked here but can't find discussion.

So... is it ground breaking feminist lit or just a bit ... meh?

OP posts:
Report
seeker · 19/02/2009 21:36

A bit....meh, IMHO. And so is the woman who wrote it. Did you hear her on Woman's Hour?

Report
morningpaper · 19/02/2009 22:03

I didn't hear that, no - was it this week? Wonder if I can track down the podcast...

OP posts:
Report
seeker · 20/02/2009 07:26

No - the week before, I think. It was funny listening to Jenni Murray trying to be balanced and opjective when you could tell she was thinking "meh"!

Report
seeker · 20/02/2009 07:27

Apparantly, according to the author, German women think it's incredibly funny.

Report
Nighbynight · 20/02/2009 08:12

I havent bought it, was put off by the words "journey round her body" in the blurb.

Report
oggsdog · 20/02/2009 08:14

I heard the Woman's Hour interview and was not overly impressed with her.
She kept harping on about how proud she was that people had supposedly fainted whilst reading the book. Jenni Murray was a bit

The the author came over as a kid going for shock value.

Must say I have googled the book though, and would be interested in your opinion mp

Report
seeker · 20/02/2009 08:22

I'm travelling to Leeds today - I'll buy it at Kings Cross for the journey. Hope I don't faint.....!

Report
BeckyBendyLegs · 20/02/2009 09:00

I've just bought that book! I hope it isn't just 'meh'! I paid good money for that after reading about it in the Sunday Times a couple of weeks ago.

Report
sfxmum · 20/02/2009 09:04

from what I have read about it so far it sounds fairly puerile and not exactly something that is 'new' but I might be wrong

Report
morningpaper · 21/02/2009 19:39

hmm I am about half way through

It is fine, I don't know why anyone would faint reading it unless they were terribly delicate but they would probably not get past the first page of graphic bumsex

I think it is quite different - I can't think of anything similar, so perhaps it needed to be published for that reason

It is quite similar to lots of the crap you find on the internet though

OP posts:
Report
seeker · 23/02/2009 10:28

OK, I've read it now, and I can't see the point. It's not enlightening, informative, funny, shocking, entertaining or sexy - and I think I want any book I read to be at least one of those things. I think it's puerile, and I can't see how it's feminist.
Anyone else?

Report
BeckyBendyLegs · 23/02/2009 21:17

I might get shot down for saying this here but I am half way through this book now and I relate to some of the things she is worrying about. I had a third degree tear when I had DS1 and I remember lying in hospital worrying so much about my poor bottom. And they wouldn't let me out until I did a poo and it took five days! Hell! The rest of the book is pretty unoriginal though it has to be said. Shocking for shockings sake.

Report
morningpaper · 24/02/2009 09:34

yes I agree with you seeker - it's just a bit puerile. I don't think it's feminist. I don't see how it's different to lots of the crap spilling around cyberspace either.

I don't find the character convincing - lots of her actions are those of a sociopath but it's not done in a convincing way (unlike something like American Psycho). And the stuff about prostitutes doesn't seem to fit in with her character, who is essentially extremely naive (hoping her parents get back together).

Not sure why it's particularly shocking, more unpleasant than shocking. Not much more than I would tell the pub my friends after a few bevvies.

I don't get the humour or the feminism or the point of it.

It was quite easy to read though and I agree Becky that there is a good story to be told about something like an arse operation from a woman's point of view - but this isn't it.

OP posts:
Report
NotQuiteCockney · 24/02/2009 09:51

Interesting to see views, I was somewhat tempted by the idea of the book, but it just sounded like a bit of a gross-out festival.

Report
BeckyBendyLegs · 24/02/2009 10:20

I wonder whether it is supposed to be slightly humourous, or is my reading it to be humourous just showing up how crap it is! I mean Helen is unbelievably obsessed with her bodily functions and secretions. I just feel sorry for her: she surely has no life beyond her sexual life. I feel almost as if the author is trying too hard to write something ground-breaking, original and shocking.

I almost feel as if I should be embarrassed to be seen reading this book. I read while walking back from dropping DS1 at school and I thought 'should I cover this book up?'

Report
Hangingbellyofbabylon · 25/02/2009 11:51

I wanted to love this book and to find it ground-breaking and innovative but I just don't. It is vile and in a way very simplistic, the only criteria to the dialogue seems to be that it has to be grotesque.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.