the husky is always the female when they're crossbred because a female pom would have issues carrying larger pups.
Not true actually, I've seen plenty of litters over the last couple of years where the dam was the Pomeranian. I would imagine in most litters of this cross it's unlikely the breeder would fork out for AI (given they rarely, if ever, bother with the most basic health testing) so I would imagine manual assistance is the order of the day.
I personally have nothing against cross breeds at all. In fact I would love to see the KC introduce sensible outcrossing programmes for pedigrees to help improve genetic diversity, remove certain heritable conditions from the gene pools of some breeds and improve extremes of exaggeration in others.
The problem I see with cross breeds as the situation currently stands is that they're bred almost overwhelmingly by less than ideal breeders, whether that's just naive pet owners wanting Fluffy to have a litter because she's so lovely or full scale industrial puppy farm churning out hundreds of puppies a year. Of course shitty breeders aren't remotely exclusive to crosses but the advantage with pedigrees is that you've got a much better starting point for finding a decent breeder: the breed clubs. They generally have fairly stringent codes of ethics which they hold their members too and can help put prospective puppy owners in touch with good breeders when their litters are still at the planning stage. It's not a completely foolproof system but it's far better than having no option but to sift through endless online adverts and trying to work out which (if any) are half decent.
I also have an issue with breeders of crosses being disingenuous about the dogs they're producing. Things like guaranteeing a poodle cross will be "hypoallergenic" or reassuring potential buyers that full health testing of the parents isn't necessary because of hybrid vigour. Again, this isn't entirely limited to crosses and you do get breeders of pedigrees making ridiculous claims about them as well. Again, this isn't entirely exclusive to breeders of crosses and you do get people making outlandish claims about pedigrees. With pedigrees though you have a lot of readily available information about what the breed should be like and it's easier to spot the dubious claims as a result.
Finally, I have a huge issue with the currently increasing trend for crosses between extremely disparate (whether in size or temperament/breed traits) breeds. People presume they're going to get the perfect mix of the two breeds (an idea often encouraged by the breeders) but in reality the resulting puppies could be anywhere on a spectrum between the two breeds and it's not necessarily clear at the point of purchase what they're going to turn out like. I can't imagine there's many people clamouring for "pomskies" who would be just as happy to end up with what essentially amounts to a Sibe and it's inevitably the dogs that suffer when it does happen.
All breeding, whether cross or purebred, should be done with a clear goal in mind and using appropriately health tested dogs carefully selected to increase the odds as much as possible of achieving that goal. Very careful consideration should be given to health, temperament, conformation and, where relevant, inbreeding coefficients.
Some crosses, because of the huge physical and temperamental disparities, are just completely counter to what good breeding should be.
As an aside, the desire for a small-ish companion breed that looks like a Siberian husky is nothing new. It's taken decades of careful breeding to get the Alaskan Klee Kai breeding relatively true. You can't just skip over all that work to reliably get mini-huskies by chucking a Pom and Sibe together.