Do you think this actress is wearing a wig/weave?

[Charliefox]

Not being horrible in the slightest, it's a genuine question. I have thinning hair, so am obsessed with other people's! What do we think though? Is it a weave or just a trick of the light? Be warned, it's the Daily Mail!

[SantaFrontPaws]

Dunno. But that dress is shocking!

[talkingnonsense]

I don't think she is. I heard her on the radio once though and she sounded lovely , you could try emailing her?

[BunnyLebowski]

Absolutely not a wig. She just has wispy bits at her hairline.

I quite like the dress. Although she's so unbelievably beautiful she could make anything look good

[CajaDeLaMemoria]

I think it's just her hair growing back in.

I don't get the big deal about the dress. Okay, so it's supposes to be see-through, and she had the fantastic idea of wearing a nude slip under it. But you can see the slip through the leg slit, so it's not really discrete, and most normal people don't walk around in see-through clothes anyway.

She does seem lovely.

[Charliefox]

Yeah, didn't think wig really but still not sure about weave. You can kind of see scalp/lighter colour underneath the lifted part of her hair towards the front.

[mirpuppet]

Could be a lace front wig -- they often put baby hairs to make it seem more natural.

[AmberLeaf]

I wouldn't immediately think its a wig, maybe a bottom hairpiece?

She has a lovely figure though. very statuesque.

[TotesFeckingAmaze]

She may have some bits of weave or clip-ons in there, yes.

She is bloody gorgeous. I think that dress is sensational, personally.

[valiumredhead]

Doesn't look like it to me - I have 'baby hair' on my hair line too.

[LadyMargolotta]

She;s always had hair like that. I have those baby hairs on my hair line too.

[EIizaDay]

Beautiful dress and how lovely to see someone sans tattoos.

[Clarabumps]

It's not a wig, could well be a weave or some clip ins..

[noddyholder]

I love the dress she is lovely.hair looks real imho