I posted this thread a couple of weeks ago. In summary a new science teacher gave out lunchtime detentions to the whole class for a breakage, and threatened no more practical work all year if the culprit didn't own up.
It's now two weeks down the line, and the teacher is sticking to the no practical work threat. Not only is she not letting them do practical work, she starts each lesson with a "This is the experiment you should have been doing, if only someone had owned up" speech, and then hands out a worksheet and they all have to work in silence.
I get that the teacher is still angry, and embarrassed about having to back down. I also understand that if you can't trust a class, then you can't do dangerous practical work.
I feel though that she's using this as an excuse and actually trying to punish the class. This class successfully managed to do practical work without any problems every week from September to February, and also successfully do practical work in DT, Food tech and PE without any bother. They are not a particularly unruly class. The breakage (according to DD) was something accidental, not deliberate.
I want to phone the HOY this time and challenge this. I just want to know:
Is practical work a part of the curriculum and an essential provision?
Is it known to enhance learning and understanding leading to better results?
If neither of these is true, why do all schools persist in including practical work, when it is expensive and dangerous?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.
Secondary education
Is practical work in science part of the curriculum?
8 replies
TittyNotSusan · 31/03/2014 23:33
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.