Advanced search

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide, which can point you to expert advice and support.

concerned family member may be a child molestor

(606 Posts)
fandomfanny Wed 07-Nov-12 15:37:42

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

EdsRedeemingQualities Wed 07-Nov-12 18:46:57

Armadillo - two good suggestions there, and Ryledup, I agree - it'd almost be odd if he instantly accepted how his childhood was. It's a long term process.

poocatcherchampion Wed 07-Nov-12 18:47:06

Why did she leave her job 7 years ago? I might be inclined to give police or social services a call if you are brave enough. They might have a few snippets to add to your concerns and they all might add up to something?

Horrid situation - poor you, poor dh and poor dd. avoid avoid avoid.

EdsRedeemingQualities Wed 07-Nov-12 18:49:01

Sorry for typos - 'rational'. And OP, you sound very humble about all this and not in any way like you have your own prejudices or axe to grind.

I think you sound a good person to make the decisions in this situation.

LittleAbruzzenBear Wed 07-Nov-12 18:51:17

So sorry for you, your DCs and DH. sad. I would go with your gut instinct. Either way there is something not right with this woman and you have to protect your children. I have to say, alarm bells massively ringing with the potty training and cream. I hope your DD1 is ok. DH needs to see a counsellor. I know I am repeating what others have said, but you need as much support and reassurance you are doing the right thing as you can get.

hildebrandisgettinghappier Wed 07-Nov-12 19:02:04

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

botandhothered Wed 07-Nov-12 19:02:06

You say she always worked with children up until 7 yrs ago. Was the reason for stopping work discussed? Or was it just that she was of retirement age?

Is it possible that she was sacked? Is there any way you could contact her last workplace to discuss the resons for her leaving? Ie pose as a future employer?
Is it possible that she has done this kind of thing before, would your FiL cover it up, if he felt she had been wrongly accused for example?

fandomfanny Wed 07-Nov-12 19:04:29

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

botandhothered Wed 07-Nov-12 19:05:11

Sorry procatcher, didn't see your post, but seems you are thinking the same thing I am!

fandomfanny Wed 07-Nov-12 19:06:32

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

EdsRedeemingQualities Wed 07-Nov-12 19:07:50

Fandom I think you have the makings of a good plan there. I really, really hope it works out - it must be hard feeling like there is conflict between you and DH over this, which is such a serious issue (I was going to say potentially serious, but I think it's already gone way beyond what would be acceptable).

Good luck, sincerely. We are here if you get stuck along the line x

BMW6 Wed 07-Nov-12 19:09:20

If she isn;t sexually abusing your daughter she is certainly acting as if she is. Why else be so furtive and underhand taking her as far away as possible??.
Please put your DD first before all other people and considerations, ring NSPCC or speak to GP but do not let this happen again, whatever the cost to others.
I am sorry for your DH but his needs are not foremost.
Wishing you good luck, and moral support.

Adversecamber Wed 07-Nov-12 19:22:23

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Gay40 Wed 07-Nov-12 19:24:29

I am sorry for your DH too, but you have to put the children first. It is his choice to deal with his own counselling and issues, but you can't put your children at risk.
I can't stress enough how important it is to follow your gut instinct on these things.

ImperialBlether Wed 07-Nov-12 19:39:59

What an awful situation.

Something that crossed my mind is that you should put it in writing and lodge it with a solicitor that if something happened to you and your husband, the children wouldn't go to stay with his parents. And yes, I know your mum is around but you need to formally state this.

Pozzled Wed 07-Nov-12 19:40:07

It's understandable that your DH would find it really hard to accept that there's a problem here. It's an awful thing to have to think about your own mother. However, if he is unable to face up to it then I think you will need to put your foot down very firmly.

As others have said, you need to protect your DCs (both of them) from the possibility of abuse. Personally, I think the only safe way is no contact, but if you do have contact, keep both DDs with you.

For OP's DH- I am not basing opinion on what may have happened in your childhood, just on the bare facts about what's happened with your daughter:
* Changing nappies and taking to potty when explicitly asked not to
* Applying cream in inappropriate places
* Applying cream when unnecessary (no soreness) and telling the child it is nice to use it
* Taking child to a distant/more private bathroom when there's a more convenient one
* Taking child to bathroom/potty when they've just been.

These facts alone are a big concern, let alone more subjective issues like your daughter not wanting to be changed by her.

I'm not an expert, but I work with children and I'd report something like this to the child protection officer at work straight away.

Offred Wed 07-Nov-12 19:40:13

I can see this is a very difficult line to walk and I know it is easy with the distance from the situation to say choose the dc over your husband. That is really what I think you should do though.

Victims of abuse go on to become abusers themselves precisely in this way; being desperate to avoid confronting the truth about what happened to them at the hands of their abuser and a fear of still being abused. FIL is a secondary abuser through his enabling actions towards the primary abuser (MIL), potentially DH could become someone you also need to protect DC from if his past abuse leads him to protect the abuser over other victims as he is doing now. It is sad but it is difficult to raise children with someone who is still in the denial phase of dealing with child abuse from a still present family member. You need to be careful and wary of him and recognise that a choice may have to be made to sacrifice him in order to not play Russian roulette with your children's wellbeing.

I agree that your conclusion, based on the things you have written here, is correct and that she has already actually sexually abused your daughter. sad You cannot trust an abuse victim who has not dealt with and is nowhere near ready to deal with his own abuse, who has not separated mentally or otherwise from his abuser, to make the decisions about what is safe. He will be extremely motivated, potentially, to put the dc at risk of harm in order to prove you wrong and save himself confronting what may well have happened to him.

I do feel very sorry for you all, it is really terrible but I think you should stick with your instincts, what is the risk/reward balance?

sugarandspite Wed 07-Nov-12 19:41:49

One tiny suggestion OP - that you and your DH sit down and discuss it with your mum together. Maybe even get him to lead the description of the incidents with you just adding details / facts if necessary.

This may help avoid him discounting her advice because 'she only thinks that because of the way you described it'

fuzzywuzzy Wed 07-Nov-12 19:45:39

I've applied sudocream 'inexpertly' it was in patches on dd's bottom down her leg, up her stomach, in my hair, in dd's mouth and hands (where she made a grab at it etc).

Where it wasn't however was in side her labia/vagina.

You're husband is an adult, he can make his own decisions, take care of himself. His choice what he wants to do/who he sees.

Your DD's are very young and vulnerable, they can't protect themselves. You absolutely have to.

Cut ties with this woman completely. Tell your husband he can't possibly want to risk your childs safety and welbeing on the off chance you are wrong in what you know you saw, how your child started behaving, how your MIL behaves towards your daughter, your husbands own very clear description of systematic abuse as a child-even if he can't remember most of it and what your instinct is screaming.
Your FIL isn't nice at all, he knows what that woman did to his sons, he knows what she is capable of and yet enables her by staying silently by her side.

Go to your GP, speak to NSPCC as suggested below. And go with your instincts on this one.

AllThatGlistens Wed 07-Nov-12 19:57:29

Please, please, please trust your instincts. Your DH is understandably not wanting to 'believe' your fears and his instinct will be to defend his mother but you absolutely must protect your children.

I would cease all contact immediately, no hesitations whatsoever. Your children's welfare simply must come first.

It must be incredibly difficult to see your DH so upset by this but your duty is to protect your little ones from a woman who is at best unstable to say the least.

Please, stay strong and resolute for their sakes.

KirstyJC Wed 07-Nov-12 19:57:31

If she worked with young children for so long, why wouldn't she be able to apply cream properly? She would have had years of practice with helping potty-training kids, so why do it 'inexpertly' with your DD?

Some good advice here I think, hope your DH gets on board with it.

Also, I think you can apply to get a background check on people who are close to your children, mainly used by single parents wanting to check on new partners - but maybe it would be worth looking into whether there is anything known about her? You might find out something that would convince your DH?

PopMusicShoobyDoobyDoA Wed 07-Nov-12 19:58:46

If she has worked in nurseries etc, there is no way that she would have applied cream "inexpertly" as it is part and partial of the job. It gives me the shivers to think she may have done this before, because let's face she would have ample opportunity.

OP, like PP poster said, I do think you have a makings of a plan there. I think it's a good idea to talk to your mum - is there any chance your mum/close friend could be around if mil is around, for back up and extra pair of hands and eyes because your mil sounds very determined to get DD alone and your DH seems to be a bit paralysed/regresses around her.

AllThatGlistens Wed 07-Nov-12 20:01:45

I agree with talking things over with your mum to get another perspective, so to speak, but I definitely wouldn't be letting her have any contact with the DC, she's already proven she refuses to listen to requests not to be alone with the little one, why on earth would anyone risk it??

PopMusicShoobyDoobyDoA Wed 07-Nov-12 20:07:50

BTW, I do agree that ceasing complete contact is for the best for the safety and well being of your DCs and your sanity and peace of mind, but families can be complicated things, can't they? I think you will eventually end up ceasing contact, I hope it's sooner than later.

carlywurly Wed 07-Nov-12 20:25:24

Agree with PopMusic - there would be nothing inexpert about a nursery nurse applying nappy cream.

The whole thing is utterly vile, she would have had countless opportunities to do this with small, vulnerable toddlers. It's a shame there isn't enough evidence to involve the police, I would definitely take advice from the NSPCC.

I really feel for you - it is very hard for your DH, and he must have had a horrible upbringing but ultimately your need to protect your dc's is paramount over anything or anyone else.

YellowTulips Wed 07-Nov-12 20:34:35

I am really sorry you are in this position.

However the reality is that a significant proportion of child abuse happens because adults find it very difficult/embarrassing to challenge behavioural red flags.

The fact is that your MIL's behaviour is not normal. For someone supposedly experienced in childcare to see the need to apply nappy cream to a potty trained child is a red flag, especially given the furtive nature in which this was done.

This does not mean your MIL has abused your daughter or is an abuser. It does however mean that you have legitimate concerns about her behaviour.

The reality is it is very unlikely you can prove your suspicions (and given the implications for your daughter you wouldn't want to).

Therefore as a responsible parent all you can do is put your daughter first. As a minimum that means absolutely no unsupervised contact with MIL even for 5 mins.

I understand this must be awful for your partner, but for my part I would ask him:

As terrible as you feel about making the decision to cut or limit your daughters contact with your mother now, think about how you would feel if in 10 years time you got a visit from social services because your daughter had rung childline to disclose she had been abused for years by your mother and you were faced with acknowledging that despite the red flags you have had pointed out to you now, you had done nothing - and by taking no action had effectively enabled the abuse? Could you answer if your daughter asked you - didn't you suspect? Why did you let me be alone with her?

Does that not make your course of action obvious?

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now