DD is in early years and is a summer born, so only 4 still. She is doing brilliantly with phonics and can segment and blend words with no problem. But while she recognises some words (e.g. He, the, is, and, etc.) there are lots of words that she has seen many times but just can't remember (e.g. can, put). Is this a problem? She is currently on the pink band/Oxford Reading Tree 1+ at school, although she has some higher level books from the library that she can decode.
So shes in reception year? I would say she's doing well.
"and", "is", etc are all referred to as high-frequency words. They are seen often, are often on boards in the class showing lots of high-frequency words...so will be some of the first words to be "read". Most other words are decoded at this age which if she is doing this then that's great.
Also "tricky" words will be taught to read on sight in reception (and beyond) these are words that cant be decoded in the usual way: no, go, mrs, mr, to, the, he,
My dd was one of the better readers in the class in reception and it wasnt until the last term of reception that she was beginning to read without the sounding out. The decoding is great and she still uses it for unfamiliar words now.
*"*^*Also "tricky" words will be taught to read on sight in reception (and beyond) these are words that cant be decoded in the usual way: no, go, mrs, mr, to, the, he,*^ *"* no they are not taught as sight words ( with the exception of Mr. And Mrs which are abbreviations ) the words can be decoded and children should be taught how to decode them
Norestformrz maybe have a look at www.teachingyourchild.org.uk/tricky-words.htm where it states.... Tricky words are those words which cannot be sounded out correctly using the Jolly Phonics sounds. The only way these words can be read and spelt correctly is by learning them and having plenty of practise
Well my dc's reception teacher last year must not have been up on the current phonics teaching.... he was straight out of uni so how more up to date could he be? He sent home "tricky words" to learn to read on sight, and said how they were tricky because they cannot be decoded easily.
Or could it be that different schools teach it differently?
Different schools do teach it differently. Not all of them are correct.
High frequency words are words that occur very frequently. Some of these will be fully decodeable with the level of code knowledge usually taught in reception. Others will only be partially decodeable.
Tricky words are words that are only partially decodeable with the level of knowledge a child has at a given point. The usually way these should be taught is to point out the tricky part and then for the child to blend the word as they would any other word.
Unfortunately being fresh out of uni in't a guarantee that knowledge is either up to date or correct.
*"*^*Well my dc's reception teacher last year must not have been up on the current phonics teaching....*^ --^*he was straight out of uni so how more up to date could he be*--^*"* you do realise most student teachers are lucky if they get an hour or so of instruction on how to teach Phonics often led by people who have no background in Phonics?
It might be more than that. Jolly Phonics must be at least 20 years old and they’ve been using the term ‘tricky words’ from the start. And not to mean ‘words that can’t be decoded and have to be learnt by sight.’
That’s what I’m thinking. It was never part of phonics teaching, but some schools have transferred it into their practice because it was part of what they were already teaching and the training in the early days was lacking.
Which is how you end up with ITT providers teaching it, schools sending it home as info for parents and websites aimed at parents promoting the same idea.