My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

When do you start showing with twins? What is life with twins like? Join the conversation on our Multiple Births forum.

Multiple births

August C-section or Sept C-section

7 replies

mummypercy · 06/07/2004 12:28

I am having twins and things are going pretty well at the moment, 29 weeks today horrah.
However I have been booked in for an elective C- Section on the 2nd Sept. The dilemma is to whether to shift it to a few days early so that the twins start school a year earlier. My partner is looking at it from a purely financial viewpoint. But the twins would literally have turned 4 before starting school proper and I would like them to have some childhood before having to be tested and examed for the next X number of years. What are other mother mothers thoughts on this.

OP posts:
Report
mrsflowerpot · 06/07/2004 12:39

purely personally, I would go with September babies! DH is a late august baby, and he hated always being the youngest in his year.I'm with you, only just turned 4 is very little to start school, although I know plenty of kids do with no bad side effects.

Also, they would get nearly 2 years of free part time pre-school education (it starts the term after the 3rd birthday)so they wouldn't be missing out on any sort of stimulation I don't think.

Report
foxinsocks · 06/07/2004 12:54

I'm mother to an August baby and my dd has July twins in her class. If I had the choice, I would definitely wait until September. I think they are much 'readier' for school when they are slightly older. You can see a big difference between those born at the beginning of the year and those at the end.

I wouldn't worry too much though, just in case it happens early!

Report
Janh · 06/07/2004 12:58

I would go for September too, mummypercy. Academically it doesn't necessarily make a difference, but in terms of confidence and social maturity it generally does. (But agree with foxinsocks, if it does happen earlier, don't worry about it - que sera sera!)

Report
twiglett · 06/07/2004 13:07

message withdrawn

Report
jampot · 06/07/2004 13:18

I can understand your point - I (and my twin sister) were born on 27th August and obviously were always the youngest in our year (although I was always top). Our mum always felt we could have done with an extra year at home though. Good points: Always have your birthday at home
If not academic, can always blame the fact that you are a year younger than everyone else (!)

Bad points: you are the youngest and therefore everyone treats you like a baby
Your friends forget your birthday party

I'd go with September - an extra few days in the womb can make all the difference (and a few days extra peace)

Report
SoupDragon · 06/07/2004 13:19

I'd go with September seeing as you have a choice.

Report
tinyganghq · 06/07/2004 15:08

My twins were born in September, which was fine by me from the starting at school perspective. I always think late Summer babies dip out on how much time they spend with Mum before having to start school, although the younger ones I see in dd's reception class seem to cope pretty well I must admit. Mind you, I'm inclined to think we send children to school a bit early in this country anyway, but that's just my humble opinion.

I had been told that twins can often arrive early and that an August birth was quite a possibility so I tried to 'keep my legs crossed' iykwim! I shouldn't worry too much though if they put in an early appearance - they'll be just fine, I'm sure. Congratulations btw, you must be very excited.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.