I have read some recent reports on the mills and mills case where the ex wife claimed and won additional maintenance years after the original financial order and this has got me nervous that my ex might come against me. My understanding was that my financial order (which was by consent but stamped by the court) was a 'clean break' which meant that neither of us could make claims on the other in the future but I am not sure now. Are there any family lawyers who can help clarify this for me. My order states that there is a transfer of a lump sum from me to him and then says that upon that happening 'neither husband nor the wife shall be entitled to make any further application in relation to the marriage under the mca 1973 s23(1)(a) of (b) ' - is this sufficient to set up a clean break and does a clean break mean that there is no way that my ex h can return for more regardless of his circumstances. Many thanks
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you have any legal concerns we suggest you consult a solicitor.
Legal matters
babybarrister ·
18/04/2017 21:11
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.