Hi there, glad I stumbled upon your post, as I very rarely read the infertility threads these days. Hopefully you can benefit in terms off knowledge from my experience, though it came too late I think to help me.
I had a similar experience, though primary infertility. I tried to conceive unfortunately quite late (39). I had one miscarriage 5 months after starting, but not a sniff after that. At 40 I went to private IVF clinics for testing etc, and requested further exploratory (laparoscopy etc that I would pay for - all private!) just to check everything out, but I only managed to convince my clinic (the Lister) once I was 41 to check if my tubes were open. They said if my tubes were clear (they were) this would be satisfactory evidence of no other issues such as endometriosis. So nothing else necessary.
The clinics all told me my infertility was undoubtedly due to age (husband's sperm is perfect) and recommended IVF. After 1 year of trying, at age 40 I underwent 3 rounds of private IVF treatment, then after a break I was back at the LISTER at 41.5 for another cycle. During this cycle a nurse during a scan commented in passing on an endometrioma on my ovary. I asked about it, and was just told blood filled cyst, likely caused by previous injury (egg retrieval). I accepted this at the time. That cycle was unsuccessful. I had a subsequent follow up with my consultant, where the endometrioma (clearly noted -and picture drawn- in my cycle notes) was never mentioned).
The next cycle after that, again during a scan when commenting on why none of the follicles on my left ovary were responding, the nurse told me " it could be because of the endometrioma. They can affect blood supply to the ovary and prevent follicle growth".
At this point I started asking to speak to the consultants. In the end three consultants (two prior to egg collection, one at egg collection) told me that the research showed no difference in IVF outcomes between women who had endometrioma removed, and those where it was left insitu (I had confirmed this with my own research). Essentially, that having the endometrioma in the first place affected IVF outcomes negatively, whether removed or not. So there was no benefit to removal (unless it grew I think over 4cm). And that due to my age there was too much of a risk trying to remove anyway, as it could push me into premature ovarian failure etc etc. So I went through with that cycle, (only one follicle grew on left ovary, all on right but exceptionally poor fertilisation rate and negative outcome).
As I happens I had just started seeing another fertility specialist (bananafish recommended) who was primarily a gynaecologist. I had done a lot of reading in the interim, which as you know in the USA they class women as having I think stage 3 endometriosis just from the mere arrival of endometrioma on the ovaries, as it's assumed by the time it turns up there, it's in multiple other places. So I asked him about the 2cm endometioma. He agreed that if I had endometriosis on my ovaries, I would have it elsewhere. He said in his experience IVF outcomes were improved after removal of endometriomas. He recommended a laprascopy to remove it. So at almost 42, I arranged for this to be carried out immediately.
Long story short, I did have endometriosis. Though not riddled with it. However he said the location of where it was, would have made getting pregnant almost impossible. Apparently all over left ovary and blocking access to my left tube. So tube clear, but eggs would never have reached it (which was apparently a shame as it was my 'best' ovary). He also showed me photos of my operation, and the left and right ovaries are far closer together than diagrams would indicate. He said that if you put eggs and endometriosis cells in a Petri dish, the eggs will die. He said that given the endometriosis on my left ovary, the right ovary due to proximity would also be affected. He thought it was likely there for 4-5years, and likely accelerated by the IVF.
Admittedly IVF (removing eggs via syringe from the follicles) is supposed to protect the eggs from any environmental damage due to endometriosis. But in my case it was causing my follicles not to grow, so IVF became pointless. Additionally, having previously had a great fertilisation rate e.g. 7/8), I now had a very low one (2/7).
Anyway, 4 months after the operation I got pregnant naturally (after not a sniff of a pregnancy for 3 years), but had a miscarriage (remember I'm 42 by now). So we will try again. But probably too late for me now at my age.
Learn from my experience. As (admittedly without knowing your age or if any male factor etc) yes absolutely endometriosis is likely the cause/ a significant contributor of your secondary infertility. The presence of endometriosis is known to impact fertility. It changes the environment, and can make it toxic for eggs once released. If you have it on one ovary, you will have it almost certainly somewhere else. Other than my ovaries, I also have some in my womb, and a couple of other more minor areas.
So yes, press for a laparoscopy. As unless you have given up on trying to get pregnant naturally, then it IS a big deal. IVF clinics in my experience get so tied up with the assembly line of IVF, that they stop considering anyone might actually still harbour a hope of getting pregnant naturally (the consultants looked at me like I was a lunatic when I suggested it).
Professor Winston has said similar - that IVF clinics should be making more effort to establish the root cause of their patient's infertiliy, rather than the blanket recommendation of IVF.
Apologies for the long post, but it's important. Obviously, I'm rather pissed off that 3 different private clinics in London said my infertility was all due to age, and wouldn't carry out any other investigations purely because I did not have typical endometriosis symptoms. This wasted 2 years (and all the associated IVF, stress and heartache). Which given I started late has likely cost me any chance of a family. My fault (met my husband late) for leaving it until 39 to try conceive, but given I was paying private the whole time, I would have expected more willingness to take my concerns seriously / more comprehensive investigations.
Get it checked out and best of luck!