Held without charge for 13-years without being charged, although one would like to assume that in a remotely civilized world that there was some basis for an arrest (and he alludes to the fact that he was no saint), but no trial and under those conditions is just plain wrong.
"Shaker Aamer, the last British resident held at Guantanamo Bay, lands back in UK"
Private jet carrying Britain's longest-serving 'Gitmo' detainee arrives back in Britain, as Shaker Aamer is thought to be in line for £1m compensation pay-out
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11964872/Shaker-Aamer-the-last-British-resident-held-at-Guantanamo-Bay-is-released.html
However call me a cynic, but I would suggest that any taxpayer funded compensation that comes from the UK (rather than the U.S. as probably should be) is not paid over in a lump sum, with the security of only a receipt.
I clearly know nothing about this man's intentions, who can, but as a taxpayer I'd be awfully miffed if after a short while any person receiving compensation for being suspected of being a potential terrorist, takes the money and ends up in the Middle East in some dodgy country/regime.
No one can adequately compensate a citizen for being locked up without charge for that time way from his family, but is it too much to suggest any such compensation claims are paid in instalments, or a smaller initial lump sums and then an annual income from the balance?
Our taxpayers £’s at work, just saying.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
News
Guantanamo Bay; the last British resident comes home to...compensation.
23 replies
Isitmebut · 30/10/2015 22:57
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.