Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation
Skip to talk navigation

Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Add post

Watch this thread

Save thread

Start a new thread

Flip thread

Hide thread

My feed

Saved Active Unanswered threads

Getting started FAQ's

Unanswered threads Acronyms Talk guidelines

Hide shortcut buttons

Talk

Flip

1 2

News

Breastfeeding in Primark mother charged with perverting the course of justice.

36 replies

Alfieisnoisy · 28/07/2015 20:18

I seem to recall this being discussed at the time she made the allegations.

She has now been charged according to this report from the Huffington Post.

www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/primark-breastfeeding-row-mother-charged-with-perverting-the-course-of-justice/ar-AAdAj75?ocid=SNYDHP

Don't know her back story but she obviously has some issues to make such an allegation and will hopefully get the help she needs.

OP posts:

Report

cashewnutty · 28/07/2015 20:20

Not allowed to talk about it.

Police have told people not to post anything online that might prejudice the court proceedings.
"Criminal proceedings have now commenced and the defendant has the right to a fair trial," a statement said.
"It is extremely important that there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings."

pinkyredrose · 28/07/2015 20:21

Issues? Needs help? That's generous thinking at best. Personally I think she's an ill educated numb nut who wanted her 5 minutes in the spotlight and probably to sue Primark on the side. Serves her fucking well right.

pinkyredrose · 28/07/2015 20:26

Huh? We're allowed to post about it aren't we?

Sparklingbrook · 28/07/2015 20:26

Best not to say anything.

Alfieisnoisy · 28/07/2015 20:43

Yes I am being generous and just trying to understand.I had dreadful PND and I suppose I am just wondering if she does too but in a different way.

Will say no more though if we are not supposed to discuss it.

OP posts:

YeOldeTrout · 28/07/2015 20:48

Lesson in don't take a knee-jerk response to the news.

cashewnutty · 28/07/2015 21:07

Another thread in chat or AIBU was deleted.

Wolfiefan · 28/07/2015 21:09

Not allowed to discuss this. Please be aware of legal implications.

GraysAnalogy · 28/07/2015 21:10

I don't mind not being able to discuss this, but how come we are allowed to discuss other matters that are going through court? It's okay if its a celeb then I take it...?

Methe · 28/07/2015 21:13

Issues? She's an attemtion seeking twat. I hope they throw the book at her.

Sparklingbrook · 28/07/2015 21:25

The police have issued a statement covering why it's best not to discuss it online. It's on the other thread I think.

GraysAnalogy · 28/07/2015 21:31

I read that, I don't understand why she's being protected and others aren't though.

But best do as they say.

bestguess23 · 28/07/2015 21:32

The police have requested that people don't discuss online. As others have said MNHQ are deleting these threads for that reason.

TheHormonalHooker · 28/07/2015 21:37

Leicestershire Police have said this

Criminal proceedings have now commenced and the defendant has the right to a fair trial," a statement said.
"It is extremely important that there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings."

Here

RugMugTug · 28/07/2015 21:40

I saw the original thing where she had a pop but what's happened since? Is there inference that the whole thing was made up?

Glitteryarse · 28/07/2015 21:41

But They could say that about any case that being took to court. How strange

Viviennemary · 28/07/2015 21:41

So what's the point of having a topic if we're not allowed to talk about it. Seems a bit pointless.

Sparklingbrook · 28/07/2015 21:44

It's just this case in particular it seems. Theres a really long thread on here that started the day it all erupted. It's nearly full so theres not much left to say.

MargoReadbetter · 28/07/2015 21:52

I thought it was for jury members not to go looking for info, not that you couldn't discuss it. How strange.

GraysAnalogy · 28/07/2015 21:55

I think it needs to be clarified, would be helpful if MNHQ could tell us what their stance is so we could avoid it in the future, prevent them from having to delete etc. Are we allowed to talk about current cases or not? I don't see why this woman is protected but no-one else is.

Sparklingbrook · 28/07/2015 21:56

Ask MNHQ?

GraysAnalogy · 28/07/2015 21:58

I was going to make a topic, is site stuff the best?

Sparklingbrook · 28/07/2015 21:59

Yes I would think so or report your post on this thread?

GraysAnalogy · 28/07/2015 22:00

I'll make a topic so others can see the response, thanks sparkling

AgentProvocateur · 28/07/2015 22:06

Remember years ago there was a poster on here who said she'd been thrown off a bus for geese feeding, and she'd gone to the local press. Everyone was up in arms, and if turned out, frim cctv, that none of it had happened. I can't remember her name. It was very sad.

Flip

1 2

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.