I'm really shocked. This poor girl, who can't currently be more than 13, is not only having her case all over the media, but the headlines seem terribly pro LeVell before the verdict is even being considered.
Despite the paediatric expert saying that there was no evidence EITHER WAY two years after the last alleged attack ( i.e it neither confirmed NOR negated abuse), the Sun and other gutter press are headlining that she never had sex at all.
Sexual abuse cases are notoriously hard to prove due to the quintessentially secretive nature of the act. This coverage will surely discourage victims to come forward?
IMO, people are mistaking LeVell for the affable character he plays and demonising the victim, who is still only a 13 year old girl.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
News
I'm finding the coverage of the Michael Le Vell case really biased against the alleged victim
157 replies
ChocsAwayInMyGob · 05/09/2013 17:11
OP posts:
Coconutty ·
05/09/2013 20:39
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.