Does anyone else think there's something very fishy about the deletion of messages on Milly Dowler's phone?
Last year the Guardian reported that messages on her phone were deleted either by News of the World journalists, or private investigator Glenn Mulcaire acting on their behalf. It later came out that Mulcaire couldn't have deleted them and the Guardian came in for a lot of stick from people who suddenly bizarrely decided that NotW had the moral highground.
The police are now saying that they don't know whether the messages were automatically deleted or whether they were deleted by a person.
The Guardian says that several sources (essentially the Dowlers and the police) told them at the time that they believed the messages had been deleted by NotW journos, and their mistake was to report this as fact.
I feel like I'm missing an important bit of the story. Surely phones only delete messages automatically if they've been listened to? And so someone was listening to those messages. If it wasn't Milly Dowler, who was it? Levi Bellfield, the man who killed her? Or a NotW journalist? And if it was a journalist, they were at least indirectly (if not directly) culpable for the fact that the messages were deleted.
Can anyone else make sense of it?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
News
The Milly Dowler case
2 replies
hackmum · 09/05/2012 18:51
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.