This is a bit long and quite dull but I would welcome some insights.
My firm is in professional services. It sets utilisation targets. By this I mean that everyone has a set number of chargeable hours that they have to charge to client codes.
This year the firm has decided that everyone who has not met their utilisation targets will automatically be graded as underperforming. The thing is that these people are competent people. The reason they are not meeting their utilisation targets is that they have not been provided with enough chargeable work to do. They are at grades where it is literally impossible for them to affect whether or not they get chargeable work.
To me it looks very much as though the firm does not want to make more redundancies (other firms are currently going through redundancy processes) but they want to force people out.
So here I am in charge of a team, three of whom are classed as underperforming (and believe you me, my team escaped lightly), and I have to agree their performance improvement plans and there is nothing they can do to improve their performance against this utilisation target. It's simply a product of the recession.
Is this even legal? I am consulting an employment lawyer on the side but I would welcome views here ...
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.
Work
Annual appraisals
3 replies
Wuldric · 09/07/2013 22:28
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.