Whilst I appreciate we are in unknown territories is there a risk to ‘following the science’ when scientists don’t seem to agree?
France are running a study saying smoking is a potential prevention against covid-19 and the FDA are saying it’s a risk factor?
I’m not a scientist so do such polar studies usually happen but us as Joe Bloggs don’t here about them until decided or are they just shooting in the dark and we should be concerned about the mantra of ‘following the science?’
Also should we be restricting how much information the masses are getting on these ‘hypothesis/studies’ as in many cases it is conflicting. There seems to be a lot of reporting from Prof so-and-so from X University where their opinion gets reported as fact (I’m not saying they may not be proven right in the long term) but many of these views seem to be at odds with each other?
www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2020-04-21/fda-now-says-smokers-may-have-higher-risk-of-catching-covid-19
www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/22/french-study-suggests-smokers-at-lower-risk-of-getting-coronavirus
*couldn’t do links on my phone - sorry
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.
Covid
Following the science?
20 replies
Hotlungs · 23/04/2020 07:59
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.