The lawsuit states that:
"In mid-January, on or around January 16, despite knowing the risks of doing so, Wuhan leaders hosted a potluck dinner for 40,000 residents, increasing the potential spread of the virus," it says. "Defendants allowed these massive public gatherings and massive exodus from Wuhan despite knowing the risks of COVID-19, including the risk of human-to-human transmission."
Of course its just politicking/electioneering, as the State of Missouri has as much chance of successfully suing China as Donald Duck. And interesting they would choose to pursue an entity which it is literally impossible for it be successful against, as opposed to say the US government/agencies for their dithering.
The wording certainly got me thinking though, how about this?
"In mid-March, despite knowing the risks of doing so, the British Government allowed the three day Cheltenham festival to proceed, increasing the potential spread of the virus, between and from the 250,000 atendees. The British Government allowed these massive public gatherings and others, despite knowing the risks of COVID-19, including the risk of human-to-human transmission."
Anyway, the blame game is underway.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.
Covid
US State of Missouri suing China
5 replies
Cam77 · 22/04/2020 09:42
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.