22 month old DD had a cold end of last week, snotty, sneezy, the usual. On Saturday afternoon it developed to a high fever(39.8) controlled by calpol, so wasn't tooworried at that stage. On Sunday she started being more miserable, wanting more cuddles and holding her blanket over her ears, culminating in last night being v wakeful during the evening and turning a lot from side to side. Mum & I both thought it could be an ear infection, so rang dr surgery first thing this morning, expecting an appointment. Dr called back, suggested ibuprofen as well as calpol, and said she didnt need to see her. I asked if it was an ear infection should something else be done, thinking again she might offer to look in her ears. Instead, she looked at DDs notes, saw she had a chest infection in April and said that because 'I knew what I was doing' she would prescribe antibiotics for if the ibuprofen didn't work. Is this normal from a GP? I am a first time Mum and the illness GP was referring to was completely different! I would kick up a fuss but DD has improved today and seems ok with the calpol/brufen cocktail. I am not giving DD antibiotics without a GP looking at her first, do you agree? Or is this common practice with this sort of thing?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.
Children's health
Dr prescribing antibiotics without seeing toddler?!
3 replies
LadyCatherinedeBourgh · 22/10/2012 12:14
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.