first time round my waters went but I didn't go into labour immediately.
I ended up being induced as my BP was high (177/110 when I arrived at delivery suite ) and DD was showing signs of distress.
I was induced with syntocinon, so I know what contractions feel like, but are they the same as "real" ones?
I had 5hrs of syntocinon (then emC/S as DD getting more distressed & my BP still too high), but nothing much happened with my cervix (DD had been breech until 38+5 & waters went at 39+4, DD's head hadn't descended at all, & being strapped to the bed with no gravity to help either meant no pressure on my cervix at all....) The contractions were painful, (3 or 4 in ten mins lasting a minute + each) but nothing I couldn't cope with using breathing/TENS However would they have been worse if my cervix had been dilating? Just wondering how much worse it would have got...
(26wks with #2 & starting to think about my birth plan...)
all thoughts appreciated, thanks
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Get updates on how your baby develops, your body changes, and what you can expect during each week of your pregnancy by signing up to the Mumsnet Pregnancy Newsletters.
Childbirth
induced contractions vs "natural" contractions
4 replies
BetsyBoop · 18/07/2007 20:54
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.