I'm 27 weeks pregnant with DC2 and frankly shitting myself about giving birth again!
With DC1 I was induced at 40 weeks due to declining amniotic fluid. It was a very fast labour - doctor listed the complete time as 1hr 12 min. Then part of the placenta got stuck and I had a PPH followed by emergency surgery/ The result was over 3L blood loss and a 10 day hospital stay during which I wasn't never left in bloody peace to sleep. I am still feeling pretty traumatised by it all tbh.
Now I'm sitting here worrying about DC2. I know second labours are generally faster. I'm worried about not making it to the hospital in time (20 min drive, and DH has to do the 5 min drive from work too) and then having another PPH at home/in the car. I have a pregnancy related bleeding disorder, so another PPH is more likely than usual.
I've talked to my consultant about this and he is very blase. No two pregnancies/labours are the same, he says. Well yes, but you can understand why I might want to limit the chance of dying in my bathroom I'm sure. No harm done if there is an emergency plan that we don't use...
Anyway I was wondering, will the induction make a difference to the length of second labour? If you were induced with your first, but not your second, was the second labour still shorter than the first?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Get updates on how your baby develops, your body changes, and what you can expect during each week of your pregnancy by signing up to the Mumsnet Pregnancy Newsletters.
Childbirth
Anyone been induced with their first and not their second?
17 replies
schokolade · 08/02/2017 09:07
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.