So I have the option of choosing a ELCS. I'm only 8 weeks so I have a long time to decide! This is my first child. I would really liek to hear your experiences of ELCS vs natural birth.
As I see it, the options from best to worst are:
- Straightforward natural delivery, no complications;
- Elective C section;
- Complicated natural birth resulting in emergency C section;
- Complicated natural birth resulting in other intervention for delivery.
(Numbers 3 & 4 may be interchangeable, this is a guess). The problem with weighing up the stats is that all we know is that 25% of births end in a C-section, and that a straightforward natural delivery is the preferable option.
However, we don't know:
(a) of the 25% of C sections, how many are emergencies and how many are elective. I think this is important because electives are vastly preferable to emergencies. With emergencies, my guess is that most of the damage and the recovery time results from the unsuccessful effort to push the baby out before the call is made to go for a EMCS, not the actual CS operation. Given elective C-sections are not widely available, my guess is that most of the 25% of birth resulting in CS are emergency CS.
(b) of natural births, how many were really natural & straightforward (textbook labour, delivery with minimal damage & no interventions) vs how many were complicated i.e. required forceps or worse e.g. sustained damage leading to surgery. (I'm assuming by the time you require forceps, you have had a long and painful labour?)
Because there are no stats available, I thought of all my friends who have given birth and collated their various stats. The outcomes from 18 births were:
- 6 straightforward, no complications
- 5 natural birth requiring interventions or surgery (meaning they were v long & painful and/or there was damage sustained)
- 7 c-sections (EMCS & ELCS)
The highly unscientific anecdotal evidence, then, suggests that chance of straightforward delivery with no intervention and not resulting in emergency C-section is 33%. Bear in mind that, even of the 6 births representing the 33% stat, I have no idea about the state of their bits after birth! They could be irretrievably altered or damaged for all I know.
Do I want to take my chances on 33% uncomplicated birth, or would it be better to go straight for the next-best option of elective C-section which presents more of a "known" risk. My biggest fear, even bigger than surgery (which I'm not really scared of, have had quite a few surgeries in my time so it holds no terrors for me) is lasting damage downstairs, resulting in problems with sex or with bladder. C-section would seem to remove this risk. I also like the idea that a CS "cleans you out" and reduces the lochia time.
However I would like 2 or maybe 3 kids so I know choosing a C section isn't ideal from this perspective.
(No doubt I am totally overthinking this. My job involves a lot of trying to mitigate risk (& controlling outcomes which I gather can be a bit futile when it comes to childbirth & parenting!!))