My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Get advice and support with infant feeding from other users here.

Infant feeding

Guardian article re Farley's change to Heinz Nurture and the subsequent price hike

16 replies

hunkermunker · 14/07/2008 00:03

Not sure if this has already been posted - MNers quoted in this article.

OP posts:
Report
policywonk · 14/07/2008 00:05

Yes, the last one quoted is kiskidee apparently. Also we have drawn the G's attention to the mad bfing stats in the last para.

Report
puffylovett · 14/07/2008 00:08

Is that figure on bfing correct ?

Didn't post on the last one, but thought it pertinent to mention that if the price hike is partly due to 'more hygienic scoop' conditions, why don't they scrap the scoop and lower the price

Report
KashaSarrasin · 14/07/2008 00:09

"The NHS encourages mothers to breastfeed if possible. Its last big survey, in 2005, suggested 76% of mothers did so for at least six months, up from 69% in 2000. Half of all mothers continued breastfeeding after six months."

Where on earth did they get those figures from???!!!

Report
policywonk · 14/07/2008 00:11

No, there's no way the figures are correct. NQC found the correct stats and posted them on the other thread - I think it was 26% still feeding at 6 months (and tbh I was a bit surprised at it being that high).

Report
Amphibimum · 14/07/2008 00:11

actually, it sounds kinda good, those figures. maybe people will think its all the reage/dead normal and try it if they think everyone else is [flippant]

Report
hunkermunker · 14/07/2008 00:16

"The breastfeeding initiation rate for the UK was 76 per cent in 2005. The rates for the four countries of the UK were 78 per cent in England, 70 per cent in Scotland, 67 per cent in Wales and 63 per cent in Northern Ireland."

Someone doesn't understand the word "initiation" or how to get past the first paragraph of a summary, I don't think www.ic.nhs.uk/pubs/breastfeed2005

Sorry, had skimmed but not seen another thread - what's it called, please and I'll go and read

OP posts:
Report
thumbwitch · 14/07/2008 00:17

perhaps he meant 6 WEEKS, not months?

Report
kiskidee · 14/07/2008 00:21

Add one ingredient of very dubious distinction, nearly double the price and viola! A miracle product. Tossers.

Report
hunkermunker · 14/07/2008 00:25

No mention in the article of just how few babies this ingredient's been tested on.

Wonder if SMA have a similar price hike on the horizon? "Declined to comment"...

I have seen how much formula is in France (18-22 euro per tub) - £14.40-17.61, according to my magic Google calculator - maybe manufacturers are hoping the market will stand for similar prices here?

OP posts:
Report
puffylovett · 14/07/2008 00:27

really ?

do they have higher bfing rates over there then hunker ?

maybe the government is behind the price hike. Lets get mums to go green and bfeed

Report
hunkermunker · 14/07/2008 00:29

No, think France has relatively low bf rates, iirc.

OP posts:
Report
puffylovett · 14/07/2008 00:32

that really is profiting out of neccessity then isn't it

Report
kiskidee · 14/07/2008 00:33

carpetbagging, i'd say, puffy.

Report
VeniVidiVickiQV · 14/07/2008 00:45

I'm not at all surprised, tbh.

Report
hunkermunker · 14/07/2008 00:45

I'd actually be interested to know how many women give their babies something other than formula in France - because you can be sure that if they put the prices up too much, babies will end up being fed Carnation milk again.

My guess is they're seeing what the market will take and pulling Farley's out of the bottom of the price range is the beginning of that process.

OP posts:
Report
hunkermunker · 14/07/2008 00:57

A French formula - I would also be fascinated to know what the French policy is on marketing formula, because I reckon a lot of this is stuff that wouldn't be allowed in the UK.

OP posts:
Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.