Mumps, measles and rubella are the most dangerous when caught by a adult, not by a child.
And the MMR, just like any other vaccines does wear off with time. Most people aren't protected 10 years or more after their last jab. That's why if you have an accident, you will always have a tetanus jab in A&E. Doctors assume that your vaccination doesn't protect you any more. Here is a nice list of long you will be protected for by different vaccines here which shows 15 years on and you are likely not to be protected (I wouldn't take a 'likely to be protected' as good enough tbh)
So knowing that adults in the 20~35yo age group are likely NOT to have had any of these illnesses and that their vaccination isn't protecting them any more, why are we not trying to vaccinate the adults more than the children?
Why is all the emphasis on the children when there is a bigger and bigger category of people who will be likely to get the illness and spread it anyway?
We have campaigns for the flu and over 60s. We have campaigns for the HCP, carers etc... but nothing for women who wants to get pregnant (and for example work in busy environment such as a school a hospital, an airport). Why are we not checking the immunity of women who want to be pregnant re mumps, measles and rubella before they get pregnant so they can have the MMR and be protected?
I don't quite understand.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
AIBU?
To wonder why adults are not at the centre of an MMR vaccination campaign?
20 replies
Questioning · 23/04/2013 16:49
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.