To think Senco should be helping my child.(37 Posts)
She should be on SA unless there are ed psychs or other outside agencies involved.
And yes the SENCO should absolutely be helping her.
Phone school, ask for interview with Headteacher, make a list of questions to ask Headteacher at the meeting. Take someone with you to jot down answers, promises etc. Keep asking. Don't be fobbed off.
In your position, and given those levels, I'd skip waiting for the scho to help and move to asking the LA for a Statutory AsseSment.
My dd1 is 8, and has severe ASD. she was diagnosed at 2. She is in a special school, and always has been. She is working at 1a for literacy and 2c for maths.
The school is clearly not going to bother doing anything else unless you up the stakes. You really need a statement, or at the very least clear plans of help (although nothing is legally binding except a statement of needs) before secondary transfer.
Yes I'd second go for a statement. The SENCo will have to work towards it so I'd make some fuss first.
Oh - she should probably be SA+ if consultant is involved. SENCo sounds terrible, sorry to hear that.
Our SENCo is just the co-ordinator, we deal with her, DD knows her but doesn't work with her - she deals with all referrals, outside specialists, etc, but she's not a TA/teacher
The SEN specialist TAs and her teacher work with DD
We're going through the whole assessment process at the moment.
DD is on School Action Plus and has an IEP. We have regular meeting with the Ed Psych, SENCo and her teacher as once the IEP has been signed, it has to be followed, so we are regularly updated with how she's doing, achievements, anything else we need to know
could you afford to get her some private tutoring.
I pay £140 per month for 2 hours a week for DS, he gets DLA for having ASD so the money comes from that.
however i would set up a meeting with both his teacher and headteacher to discuss this anyway
The HT would have to explain why your DD has made no progress.
Have a meeting with her asap, take a list in and discuss all your concerns. I would have thought she should be on SA+ at the very least (hard to get a full statement), with clearly defined objectives on the IEP, which have to be agreed with you.
And don't accept any 'we can't afford anything' stuff. She should certainly have some allocated TA or teacher time (possibly in a small group) if not direct teaching from the Senco.
I would try to get in touch with them again because they sort being doing more. HOwever, I know how you feel in terms of not returning calls. I have been leaving messages for my dd's senco all this week and not one has been returned!!!
Hope you get somewhere soon.
The SENCO might not always work directly with the children - some are also class teachers. They are there to co-ordinate provision though, and should meet with parents who request it. It also sounds that if progress has been limited / targets not achieved at each review, then they should have been asking questions at previous reviews each term over the years as to what they could try next / who they should be asking for further support.
Where are you based? I bet you I can find someone who is experienced in SEN who might want to tutor.
God - NO! She has already not progressed in 6 months, she should be having intervention already. This SENCo is making ME cross now!
We've been advised against a tutor too, until we get to the bottoms of how DD learns. Otherwise, we're just putting a sticking plaster over a boil.
Dyspraxia had originally been suggested with DD (they're now looking at ADHD and asd) and our main problems is her working memory, ie, she has none. We've been given lots of activities and games to help her. Has anyone suggested anything like that?
Sorry - x posted.
I'm in London which is a bugger. Sorry about that. Definitely make a fuss. Talk to the HT after one last attempt to meet with the SENCo.
I'm a SENCo and if I haven't an appointment with someone after a week I feel terrible. Get on it!
if your dd has been there for over a year, and shown little to no progress, then realy truly you need to cut out the middle man (ie school) and move straight to SA.
be prepared ot be turned down. this is standard LA operating procedure.
get your arguments lined up, prepare your case, and go fight for what your dd needs. it will be a fight, unfortunately (as you are already seeing), but you are your child's best (and probably only) advocate.
don't waste anymore time trying to ge tthe school to meet with you and agree a way forward. document all the times you have asked for meetings. write down all the times your dd ahs not progressed/you have asked for extra help.
this will help you in your argument with the LA for a statement.
read the IPSEA pages on how to apply for a statement, and get on with it.
it take s aminimum of 6 months to get a statement in place, so you have no time to lose if you want one before secondary (it took us 3 years to get a statement, despite my dd1's very clear and obviosu needs)
If you are going for a statement, can I advise:
Make it very clear in a covering letter what the needs are, what has been done already but even more importantly, what you want from them.
I've been on SEN panels and have good success rate with statement applications, so good luck. Happy to read over stuff if you message me.
you are right, please don't judge.
but on the other hand, it can be standard practise for LAs to reject a certain percentage of statement applications regardless of level of covering letter.
I used the standard IPSEA template, not a word more, and got granted assessment on first application. others I know have written far more indepth application letters but been turned down and had to appeal. it's a complete toss up, tbh.
and that's before any real wrangling starts...
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, watch threads, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now »
Already registered? Log in with:
Please login first.