Jasper, according to research in Scotland, 2% of elective CS's are due to maternal request. It set me to thinking how terrifying it must have been in days gone by to have a baby, with none of the modern aids we take for granted and a very high chance of dying in the process.
Robinw, there are lots of reasons why elective CS's require careful thought. Of course, some CS are life or healthsavers, undoubtedly, but the optimal CS rate seems to be between 7% and 15%. Rates above that show no benefit to mother or child. CS also cost the NHS a great deal more money.
These are the risks cited on an NHS website.
"A Caesarean section is a major abdominal operation and all operations and anaesthetics have risks. Being pregnant and having an operation can increase the risk of:
blood clots in the legs (also know as Deep Vein Thrombosis or DVT), which may pass to the lungs (pulmonary embolism) ? 4 times more likely than with a vaginal birth.
serious blood loss during and after the operation ? 2 times more likely.
damage to the bladder and bowel ? 6 times more likely.
When compared to vaginal delivery, it is difficult to predict when women who have had a Caesarean section will recover from the birth and be able to resume all their usual activities. Some women can take a long time to feel better, some have on-going problems with pain from the operation. Occasionally, women can have problems in future pregnancies, or at future operations, with scarring inside the abdomen. In addition, doctors know that more babies, of the same age, born by elective Caesarean section can experience breathing difficulties in comparison to those delivered vaginally. Although very rare, death of the mother is four times more likely in Caesarean sections than in vaginal deliveries."