Nuchal scan shows one in 3 risk - feeling sad and stunned.
|
(154 Posts)
|
With utmost respect and admiration for all parents of children with DS, DH and I both grew up with younger relatives with severe SN, and although we know there are no guarantees in life as well as many fantastic families affected by DS, we were always going ahead with screening.
Had the nuchal this evening (12+4) and it's all very sad, confusing and conflicting news. One in three risk of DS and a one in 36 of Edwards. My bloods (w 9) were crazy bad (Dr said she expected a MC when she first saw the data). The neck measurement is 2,7 but weirdly the bad blood value does not indicate DS, more like Edwards, which I understand is a more severe chromosome abnormality. The baby is big and long, which could explain the bigger neck, and the fingers perfect, which speaks against Edwards. I'm 35 and this is #1. Being fast tracked for placenta biopsy - spending tomorrow at hospital hankering for a free slot - and would really appreciate to hear from anyone who has been in a similar situation.
The baby was v wriggly and beautiful, heartbeat normal.
Thank you so much. x
Thank you so much everyone.
Hurrah! Congratulations Mandy!
So pleased for you!

Oh poo !! Didn't realise having the baby was harder at 35 - let alone conceiving it in the first place !!
So glad to see you had good news with your test though.
Mandy,
I've been following your thread.
Just want to say I am so HAPPY for you and your dh.
I remember those worrying times whilst pg with ds the other year.
tee hee

Oops

.
Sorry, I am not well, I think that flu has overcome my irony-detector!
Six, I think she may have been being sarcastic.
At 35??? Blimey.
I don't think it's "refreshing and non-patronising" at all, actually. But I really don't want to piss on your bonfire when you are so happy so I am going to wind my neck in now. Take care and all the best.
Mandy73, elective is the safest way to have a baby! It negates the need for an emergency CS! It reduces many risks for the infant and only has teeny tiny risks for mummy...which are so minute they aren't worth discussing.
Well, SixSpotBonfire, at my age it's only VB without complications that's safer than elective CS. And only 50% of VBs are without complications. And you never know which half you'll be in.
Luckily MW and consultant is on our page on this one. Or, as lovely GP said, "You're very realistic so I can be too: Women at your age just aren't that good at VB."
How refreshing & non-patronising is that!?
xx