I had not realised many of the stresses of the job until learning about the strike, and completely accept the need for better working conditions (which is practically the same thing as patient safety).
But why say a starting salary is X when it is XplusY for all except the minority who never do overtime? Why say it isn't about pay in the middle of a settlement negotiation that is about pay and only pay?
If they would walk out until there were enough social workers and social care beds, I would be on the streets with them. A strike targeted at a solvable problem would be one thing. But I don't think pay is their real problem - their real problem is not being resourced to do the job. I also think they have very naïve ideas indeed of what other people earn and indeed of the ability of other professionals to even stay in the workplace at all after having kids. It's particularly unfortunate when they say "I could leave and work in the city" (the naivety of that remark would mean they wouldn't get an interview).
In short, I feel like the Gov. and the BMI have been playing a dispute game with each other in London that misses the point of what's really wrong. I feel the BMI is trying to equate "back our strike" with "back the NHS" and I just don't accept it. I think they need to protest better, smarter, more honestly.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
AIBU?
to think the doctors' union could have handled things better
48 replies
MissTriggs · 11/02/2016 20:52
OP posts:
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.