Hi....
Thinking I might find some helpful teachers who can comment on how good or bad this idea is....
DD is just moving to year 9 from a middle school system and the HT, even though the children at the end of year 8 did tests for setting them in year 9, has chosen to not set classes at all until after October half term.
I think this is awful and detrimental to both low and high achievers.
On the trial week before the summer hols, DD said she was sat next to a dyslexic child who was finding it so hard to keep up, DD had to basically read everything and teach her how to do it all. DD didn't mind but the other child struggled to understand anything and DD didn't finish her own work.
I've chatted to a relative who is a teacher and she thinks that whilst being tricky for the children, it would also be a complete nightmare for the teachers who will have to differentiate a massive range of levels.
The HT said he wanted to watch the kids for the first half term and make sure they were put into the right sets.
SIl said it would be much easier on everybody if they settled them using their Yr 8 results and current levels and then just shift one or two up or down should, they need it after assessment by their set teachers.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.
Secondary education
Not setting new yearc9's for a whole half a term
23 replies
Verbena37 · 26/08/2015 22:28
OP posts:
tiggytape ·
26/08/2015 23:01
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.