My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you have any legal concerns we suggest you consult a solicitor.

Legal matters

tree - currently unprotected any retrospective come back if we remove?

5 replies

mulranno · 05/04/2011 14:23

We have a large beech tree on our boundary (on to public foot path) which we want to remove. My understanding is that it does not have a preservation order on it. Are we free to remove it? or are there any permissions we need to seek in advance - want to avoid this step tho as imagine that if we ask a PO will be slapped on it - are there any consequences to removing the tree without permission?

OP posts:
Report
sneezecakesmum · 05/04/2011 20:43

If a tree with no preservation order is on your property you can cut it down. They are after all sometimes damaging (via the roots) your foundations. However you say its part on a public footpath, so you need to establish for sure it is your tree so I suppose the planning office will tell you. Make sure your indemnity insurance is up to date before you do anything.

Report
DownyEmerald · 05/04/2011 21:03

Are you in a conservation area? I think you have to ask permission to even do some lopping of branches if you are, let alone cut down.

Report
TCOB · 05/04/2011 21:07

You have to advertise it if it is over a certain height in order for others to have the chance to apply for a preservation order if you are in a conservation area. Preservation Orders are reactive - they are only made in response to threats rather than systematically.

Report
queenrollo · 05/04/2011 21:47

as far as i'm aware there are also rules about the time of year this can be done depending on the type of tree due to nesting birds. not sure on the actual rules but it's worth checking.

Report
mulranno · 06/04/2011 22:47

brilliant .... thanks so much this is v helpful

OP posts:
Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.