there seems to be more focus in the media at the moment as the 'all natural' movement has gained momentum, esp via bloggers, facebook, etc. there's also been a rise in home birth attempts in recent years, plus a rise in mothers with concomitant illnesses like diabetes, plus the ever-snowballing cuts to NHS services - all of which will affect this on a population level. not necessarily relevant to any one individual though, which is some comfort.
ultimately it comes down to real information and understanding of the stats - without 'spin' from either side. There are risks, thankfully here they are very low whatever the setting, so no need to be afraid, but women should be offered the 'going in eyes wide open' approach.
I'm a medical scientist by training, now a writer, and have edited obstetrics textbooks. I'm expecting my first imminently, and to me my detailed knowledge helps me feel in control, and to mentally prepare for anything. The idea that 'interventions' are in themselves a 'risk' seems bizarre to me, since things are not done without a medical indication (see - NHS cuts!) and it's impossible to tell except in hindsight which were 'necessary' or not. I don't relish the idea of any of it, but the 'risk' doesn't come into it when compared to any avoidable risk to the baby....
and of course homebirth is 'less likely to have interventions' because they are simply not available at home!
I also don't understand why we are asked to take such great care over food, car seats, technology etc then are told that the one riskiest event in the baby's life (stats - the likelihood of mortality on the day of birth is not repeated until aged 85!) can be 'left to nature'...it's sad that some mums are being set up for guilt/disappointment by the very care providers they should be able trust completely. Sure, experience is very important (even though I know I have no say in it ultimately, I think about how I'd like things to go!) but not at any cost.